escaped
I'm sorry you don't remember Doodledog, but the references to posters being in a clique or bullies, didn't go down well with me or others.
Thankfully most discerning posters saw the chit-chat' for what it was - an attempt by posters to take the 'heat' out of the thread. But no way did a large number get embroiled in the ^vilifying the DPM discussion.
I was removed from GN on the back of that thread, so I feel very strongly.
I do remember - it's just that my recollections differ from yours.
But I was one of the 'uppity' posters (and that word says it all really) who objected to the way a group took it on themselves to decide that they would close the thread by 'chatting' and excluding anyone trying to make points of their own. In fact, I was the one who used the term 'mean girls', and I got several PMs thanking me for saying it.
It's water under the bridge now as far as I'm concerned, but rewriting history is really not on. I don't know who you were before, and have no wish to hold anything you may have said against you now, but it is just not true that there were a couple of posts about AR being a 'tart' - there were pages of them - and if I'm not mistaken the thread made the national press. The thread has been linked to above, so people can see for themselves. The thread was not the only one that used derogatory terms against AR at the time - not her politics, but her class, her cosmetic surgery, her accent, her 'illegitimate' child and so on, so reading the thread in isolation won't really give a flavour for the tone of GN in the weeks surrounding the GE.
Your comments above about 'discerning posters' (ie not me
) and how I have clearly upset 'you [and] others' are noted, however. The latter sounds vaguely threatening, but I'll survive
.
I do understand that you will feel strongly, but can assure you that I didn't report you (whoever you were at the time) and nor did I report GSM or anyone else. There was really no need in any case, as the comments spoke for themselves, and passing on legal knowledge does not give anyone a free pass to do as they please on a moderated discussion board. As I don't know what you said on the thread I have no way of knowing whether I would have approved of HQ's actions at the time or not, but if you were banned/suspended simply for filibustering then I wouldn't have, for what it's worth.