CanadianGran
Dadima, in reply to your post Fri 16:50, I didn't actually read that he wasn't using his title, but assumed. As Canadian, the RF is not often in the news like they are over there.
I just thought it was odd the way the media referred to them and assumed they should do it properly, although I admit I don't know what the proper way is,
So Prince Harry is correct for him, how should she be properly named? Duchess Meghan or The Duchess of Sussex, etc.
so I looked up other Duchesses. Sophie Rys-Jones is the Duchess of Edinburgh. What would she be called in a newspaper headline?
I guess this post was more about what to call H & M rather than interest in the actual couple. And I guess assuming the media should do things properly, then wonder the reason they don't. Since we don't have royalty living here, they are not in the news other than perfunctory mentions.
I am impressed you know the full name of Duchess of Edinburgh.
Many years ago, when we were attending a Christmas meal and concert at St James Palace organised by a charity, no one sitting around our table knew the name of Princess Anne’s husband, not even the bloke representing the charity. My husband even called him John. I did not see anyone curtsying to the Royals either.
With that blasé attitude towards the Royal family, I am not surprised the newspapers here named H&M casually instead of their proper title.
As far as I know, Windsor is not their real surname. Their real surname is Saxe-Coburg.
During World War One when Britain was fighting German, there was huge anti sentiment towards the Germans in this country, so they changed their German surname to Windsor after Windsor Castle.
Harry changing his children’s surname to his title is not historically correct but not surprising since he is a complete tosser.
My daughter works with Californians. She told me that the Californians are quite particular with hierarchy more so then the British.