Gransnet forums

Chat

The D. And D. Of Sussex In The News Again.

(601 Posts)
Calendargirl Wed 02-Oct-19 07:42:53

Looks like the Daily Mail is being sued by them regarding a private letter from the Duchess to her estranged father.

Who is behind the letter being shown to the paper? An unhappy member of their staff? Or Mr. Markle maybe?

Gonegirl Wed 09-Oct-19 09:21:00

I think the "what is love" comment spoke reams. And we do know that Camilla was always present in the marriage.

Anniebach Wed 09-Oct-19 09:18:26

We only know ‘how Charles treated her’ from the media and what she claimed, Charles has never spoken of that time.

Gonegirl Wed 09-Oct-19 09:16:29

She was very easy to love. She was beautiful, charming, caring, and brave.

Gonegirl Wed 09-Oct-19 09:14:06

a lot of people

Gonegirl Wed 09-Oct-19 09:13:34

I think it was a fact that a of people simply loved Diana, and felt sad and angry about the way Charles treated her. And how she was used by controlling people behind the royal family.

Anniebach Wed 09-Oct-19 09:06:20

Diana was the first celebrity in the royal family . The Windsors were not popular at that time because they were seen the as the villains and Diana was seen as their victim.

All we know of her marriage is what she said publicly, I have
much sympathy for her because in my opinion she was mentally ill, I also have sympathy for those who had to cope
with her illness and I do speak with experience of what this
can do to families.

Iam64 Wed 09-Oct-19 08:39:00

I suspect the public sympathy shown when Diana died was linked to recognising she may have been born into a wealthy privileged family but she didn't have an easy time as a child. Then she married at 19, with little life experience or support, to a man much older and more experienced than she could possibly have been.
She lived in a goldfish bowl and began to use the media in order to find some positive press for herself. Not unusual behaviour for someone in the public eye.
She died in a ridiculous car accident that shouldn't have happened when a drunk driver was part of a ridiculous attempt to avoid the parrapazi. She left two young boys without a mother and you'd have to be without empathy not to feel sad about it all.
It was unusual in England for such an outpouring of feelings to be shown. Nononan has a good point that her death reminded us life can change in a second no matter how wealthy or privileged people may be. Just like the rest of us really

notanan2 Tue 08-Oct-19 23:03:11

Diana really wasnt that universally popular in the run up to her death. She had her fans but it wasnt particularly cool to be one!

I think at the time society felt the urge or need to come together ot collectively emote or something. I do not think that eve half of those tears were acually for Di! There was a lot of emotion but it was kind of contagous. And at the time the RF was NOT in favour so grieving for Di was almost a two fingers to the others.. like taking a side against them!

Also a little bit there was an eliment of Di having the best security/healthcare/etc money can buy and she STILL died so we all felt a little more mortal!

grapefruitpip Tue 08-Oct-19 20:15:58

?

NotSpaghetti Tue 08-Oct-19 20:13:58

grapefruitpip - please read the thread!!

grapefruitpip Tue 08-Oct-19 19:21:44

Diana's death was a massive shock. A baby which the public knew was coming 6 months in advance, is not a shock.

Anyhow, I really don't care. The RF neither bother me nor vastly interest me.

I suppose I favour hard working Anne, who fits into those 1970's tweeds and Meghan because she seems a bit of a laugh.

Bridgeit Tue 08-Oct-19 19:17:20

Everything in life isn’t - either/ or

Bridgeit Tue 08-Oct-19 19:15:11

It is an assumption to assume that those who have knitted something for the new baby, don’t knit for anyone else.

merlotgran Tue 08-Oct-19 18:53:25

The baby presents are all given to charity I think

Anniebach Tue 08-Oct-19 18:52:01

Yes shock and with a new baby , joy .

grapefruitpip Tue 08-Oct-19 18:48:13

I suppose lonely people feel over invested in a family that couldn't give a about them. Sort of sad really.

I think with Diana, there was some element of shock .

Anniebach Tue 08-Oct-19 18:37:13

I don’t know why people knit for the babies, same as I don’t know why so many laid flowers when Diana died .

grapefruitpip Tue 08-Oct-19 18:30:08

punished? Could it be your a tad over invested?

Greenfinch Tue 08-Oct-19 18:28:54

Why would anyone knit for a Royal baby when there are children in Africa and elsewhere desperately in need of clothes ?

Greenfinch Tue 08-Oct-19 18:26:02

Absolutely ! Agreed NotSpaghetti

Calendargirl Tue 08-Oct-19 18:24:23

Anniebach

Do the people who knit gifts for Royal babies really think that these babes will ever wear them? Especially nowadays.
They will all be donated to hospitals, charities, whatever. I doubt if Kate and Meghan have any idea what has been sent to them.

NotSpaghetti Tue 08-Oct-19 18:18:30

Greenfinch, like you, I don't feel at all punished, but as Anniebach says, it's a snub for all those who do care.
My personal feeling is that if you want privacy, fine... give up the public purse (and the platforms that go with it) and get on with your life.

Anniebach Tue 08-Oct-19 18:11:18

It wasn’t a punishment , it was a snub to the many , there are
people who knit gifts for a Windsor baby.

Greenfinch Tue 08-Oct-19 17:58:07

Those of us who are not the slightest bit interested in this family would hardly regard this as a punishment. I read this thread because I am interested in the views of others on this subject and why they think as they do.

NotSpaghetti Tue 08-Oct-19 17:17:12

They would obviously like more "control" of the press. They have punished the UK by showing the baby first in South Africa rather than the UK.