So because I have agoraphobia, which is definitely irational , I am mad ?
Petition to stop the EARLY RELEASE for PC Harpers killers
Girls grammars in the 60s (and beyond)
Mega dinghies transport 230 migrants in one go. 80,000 arrived under Labour.
An Australian magazine has published an article saying that Charles and Camilla are about to announce their divorce. Apparently they haven’t been seen together for sometime.
Speculation or not?
So because I have agoraphobia, which is definitely irational , I am mad ?
Perhaps having multiple user names and telling lies on a forum could be seen as being mad by some people?
Welcome to GN Lily65
Perhaps having multiple user names and telling lies on a forum could be seen as being mad by some people?
After such a short time I can only assume that you are referring to forums other than GN.
Or do you have some insider information? 
"Perhaps having multiple user names and telling lies on a forum could be seen as being mad by some people?"
How do people manage to have multiple names? When I first joined GN my late husband also tried to join, using his email address, but was unable to do so - we assumed because we were both using the same computer and IP address.
" Perhaps having multiple user names and telling lies on a forum could be seen as being mad by some people ?"
What's that all about ??
Well, the papers here have been trying to manufacture some kind of fake feud supposedly between Kate and Meghan - I imagine the media reckons we're SO bored with the Brexit that we'll fall for any alternative hogwash!
Margs it's terrible the way the media bashes the Royals just to get a story, albeit an untrue one, also knowing that the Royals can't " fight back ".
I thought it was a known fact, Gabriella< that George 111 suffered from porphyria, not schizophrenia? Porphyria wasn't a diagnosis at the time, but all the reports of his symptoms tally, and it is thought that several of his relations also inherited the disease, right up to the 20th Century (and that Mary Stewart/Queen of Scots may also have had it - she was related)
Prince William of Gloucester was diagnosed with Porphyria, first cousin to the queen
Not saying this is true or not, I am not overly interested, but I remember many years ago being surprised when German friends said Princess Margaret was divorcing, and again some time later that Charles and Diana were splitting up too. It was all over their papers but not in ours. Europeans have always seemed to be more interested in the royal family than maybe we are.
I thought it was a known fact, Gabriella< that George 111 suffered from porphyria, not schizophrenia? Porphyria wasn't a diagnosis at the time, but all the reports of his symptoms tally,
Yes, that is what I understood too Elegran. I've never heard any mention of him having schizophrenia.
Porphyria sounds like an absolutely miserable condition to have.
Elegran
I bow to your superior information. Evidently, you have a working knowledge of those who suffer from schizophrenia and porphyria.
My mad bad. 

Of course, neither schizophrenia nor porphyria could have been diagnosed at the time, so any diagnosis now is retrospective, but a lot of notes were kept on symptoms and the progress of his illness and what treatments he received (most of them barbaric)
When the study of mental illness was the hot topic, schizophrenia was the most popular retrospective diagnosis, but later porphyria became the most preferred. George 111 had all the physical signs and symptoms as well as (later on) the mental ones - and he would not have imagined (for instance) dark red urine, that was observed and noted by his physicians.
Other people sharing his genes also showed some or all of the signs and symptoms.
It's as well to know what you're talking about when posting comments.
Elegran
I suggest that you Google 'The Madness of King George' and it will tell you that the erroneous diagnosis of porphyria was due to the colour of the King's urine which was blue, due to medication. A better more authentic and knowledgeable description of his symptoms and diagnosis is given by renowned historian Dr Lucy Worsley on the BBC News forum shown in the attached photo. I cannot link it from my mobile but it's easy to access.
Today's diagnosis is that he was mentally ill, hence, the title of the film is correct.
There is a very good, easily understandable (to the layman) book by Neel Burton (correct spelling) titled The Meaning of Madness.
He's also written others including one on schizophrenia.
I hope this comment shows my effort to post an informed appraisal of the subject.
Elegran
Screenshots of subject.
Thank you for your contribution. There are differing opinions on what he was suffering from. I wonder whether the other descendants had all been given the same medication, right up to Prince William of Gloucester (1941-1972) ?
His urine was BLUE due to medication, not the colours associated with porphyria.
Personally, I would not challenge Dr Worsley's account nor those of the notable scientists who contributed to her assessment and conclusions.
Hair from George III has been analysed and found that it contained 300 times the acknowledged toxic level of arsenic, probably due to a medication given to him called James's Powders. Arsenic is known to trigger poryphyria, so his medication made him worse.
(Science Museum)
Perhaps a 'chicken and egg' scenario.
Sorry spelling!
It is impossible to try to correct anything today
If in doubt, why not ask your doctor AnnieBach ? 
Unless he could be exhumed and tests done directly on his tissues, we shall never know for sure, but it seems to me very possible that he had a gene that gave him a predisposition to porphyria (and which was inherited by several of his descendants who displayed symptoms) but that the medication he was given for his earlier milder attacks contained arsenic and exacerbated his illness. The gentian-based digestive medicine which tinged his urine blue was administered because he was already suffering from the abdominal pain.
References -
In George 111's hair "An unexpectedly high concentration of arsenic (17 parts per million [ppm]), compatible with systemic toxicity, was also detected. Control hair samples had concentrations of arsenic between 0·05 ppm and 0·25 ppm (table). Values greater than 1 ppm in hair are thought to indicate possible arsenic poisoning."
"Although there is no established proof that arsenic alone provokes acute attacks, exposure to arsenic and lead in “moonshine” whisky has been reported to precipitate variegate porphyria12 and excretion of porphyrin metabolites correlates with the degree of chronic arsenic exposure in animals and man. If George III did indeed inherit the inborn error of metabolism that causes porphyria, he would be sensitised to the effects of arsenic and other heavy metals. Indeed, amounts of toxic metal insufficient to induce frank poisoning would, in all probability, exacerbate porphyric attacks in a susceptible individual." pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e71f/5dd29ba98b360969e5f4af6298417832ad10.pdf
"a single report of blue urine followed six reports of normal urine during the previous six weeks. Peters and Wilkinson suggest that the prescription of extract of gentian as a digestive stimulant three days earlier may offer an explanation for the discoloration. " It would explain that single report of blue urine, yes, but his physicians must have been aware of that likelihood and would have commented on the cause?
And
"Since heme is a pigment, it stains the urine. Usually the urine is tinged red or purple, but there are cases in which the urine turned blue, or left behind blue stains. " io9.gizmodo.com/the-king-who-peed-blue-930843334
"if George III had inherited porphyria, then half of his 15 offspring and eight siblings should also have had the porphyric gene." But it often descends "silently" only appearing on some trigger - and several descendants showed signs and symptoms (including the dark urine)
Why are we all talking about schizophrenia on a thread about Charles and Camilla? Let's keep to the topic.
When I was in the USA the National Enquirer published loads of outrageous stories about the Royals - it didn't have to be true- it sold papers. You can see it now on YouTube more gossip about the Royals. It's best ignored.
Now Charles and Camilla have got what they wanted and are together. Will we have a Queen Camilla? (Hope not!)
Gabrillela you seem to be the medical expert on this thread, you diagnosed madness , why would I bother to consult anyone when you know it all !
I do hope we will have Camilla Queen Consort
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.