Gransnet forums

Chat

Queen of the world

(64 Posts)
Newquay Wed 26-Sept-18 02:23:24

Just watching the prog. I really find it quite distasteful-yes I know I have an off switch! The royal family is so cynical. They keep themselves to themselves when it suits. Now, when folks are openly talking about havingbhad enough of this spoiled family this film is put out. They really do have a nerve. . . and a very good PR team!

Anniebach Thu 27-Sept-18 08:38:49

Zara Phillips does not live independently, she lives on her mothers estate , she has done quite well in show jumping but her horses are from the Queens stud farm. She gets on the balcony for all occasions . So realy no different to her cousins

paddyann Thu 27-Sept-18 08:50:20

They have the best PR team ,personally I find it distateful that anyone would consider themselves to be "the queen of the world" with all the privilege that entails when the world is a hellhole for millions .Maybe Lizzie would like to house some of the homeless and feed the poor ? NO? They are so far beneath her in her perception she doesn't know they exist.Its a mediaeval concept in the 21st century and it should be binned.As soon as Lizzie dies ,even I wouldn't chuck an old woman out of her house....oh wait,didn't she do just that to give the house to her grandson?

annep Thu 27-Sept-18 08:53:53

I agree wholeheartedly Paddyann but what's that about her grandsons house? I haven't heard that.

Anniebach Thu 27-Sept-18 08:58:31

Paddyann who is the woman the queen evicted?

Mapleleaf Thu 27-Sept-18 09:36:51

I’ve not seen the programme, so may be missing something here, but the queen is not the “queen of the world” as far as my general knowledge goes!

DIL17 Thu 27-Sept-18 12:00:08

Anniebach Lots of people live with their parents and the fact it's her mother's land just makes her mum the landlord.

She receives no title with land or income attached as has no claim on the sovereign grant. Apart from renting/owning a house on ehr mother's land, she's the same as everyone else.

Elegran Thu 27-Sept-18 12:11:38

Does she consider herself "Queen of the world" ? Paddyann Has she tried to impose her rule and sovereignty over the whole globe, or is she "just" respected for her experience and discretion? Chapter and verse, please.

She is the head of state of an important country, with links through the Commonwealth to a lot of other countries., so she is a world figure The Commonwealth these days has grown up, it isn't a child taking orders from Mummy.

Situpstraight1 Thu 27-Sept-18 12:14:16

I doubt very much that the Queen chose the title for the programme.

Anniebach Thu 27-Sept-18 12:31:15

DIL, Andrews daughters have no claim on the sovereign grant , the only difference is Andrews daughters have a title.

Zara married in Scotland which was sensible as the Windsor move there for the summer, there was police protection on the royal mile and at the church . Yes she lives on her mothers estate which was bought by queenie.

Andrew seems to find dropping from 2nd in line to the throne to 7th difficult, his problem . The carriage ride around Windsor should be cancelled,

Eichmann123 Thu 27-Sept-18 16:15:24

Your comment is what my late dear mother would have called 'common'.

Eichmann123 Thu 27-Sept-18 16:50:52

not fair. snobbish I think.

Anniebach Thu 27-Sept-18 17:13:41

I await Paddyann to give the name of the woman queenie evicted .

Elegran Thu 27-Sept-18 17:21:07

Inverted snobbery is as prevalent as snobbery.

Anniebach Thu 27-Sept-18 17:27:03

Was I the poster condemned as common/ snobbish ?

merlotgran Thu 27-Sept-18 18:16:30

Our daughter lives in a bungalow on our estate.

Ooooh . Doesn't that sound grand? grin

annep Fri 28-Sept-18 05:27:08

Yes it does, and is Merlotgran.?.

Mapleleaf Fri 28-Sept-18 10:16:05

Have you had an in depth conversation with HM to know that "the homeless and the poor are so far beneath her in her perception she doesn't know they exist", paddyann?
None of us know what she does behind the scenes, or what she thinks about things going on in the world.

annep Fri 28-Sept-18 11:49:42

Mapleleaf I do know she hasn't given one of her palaces to the homeless!

Elegran Fri 28-Sept-18 12:26:46

But has she given money and/or support to help provide places of their own? She doesn't publicise her giving, doers that automatically mean it doesn't exist, or just that she isn't saying?

Elegran Fri 28-Sept-18 12:28:03

But has she given money and/or support to help provide places of their own? She doesn't publicise her giving, doers that automatically mean it doesn't exist, or just that she isn't saying?

If she did give a palace to the homeless, would they be grateful to have to heat it and keep it maintained?

Elegran Fri 28-Sept-18 12:28:23

Posted too soon.

Anniebach Fri 28-Sept-18 12:32:47

She has no palaces to give away.

Elegran Fri 28-Sept-18 12:49:26

There are Middle Eastern speculators who built whole blocks in London as investments, which still stand empty - how many of those have been given to the homeless?

merlotgran Fri 28-Sept-18 13:23:18

There's a lot of sense in royal offspring living in properties that already exist. Security and maintenance for a start. I did raise my eyebrows at the cost of renovating William and Kate's apartment in KP and Harry and Meghan are apparently going to move into the one vacated by the Gloucesters after extensive renovations. Security must surely be more cost effective with them all in the same place though.

Eugenie and whatever his name is are living in one of the KP 'cottages' so he's done alright. Who will provide the country pad, I wonder?

Anniebach Fri 28-Sept-18 13:29:08

I agree it’s best they live in K.P. Windsor and St.James , saves on security. William doesn’t have a country estate, he has property in queenie’s privately owned Sandringham, again saves on security