Don't want to completely hi-jack the 'Christmas in four words' thread so I've started this one. Feel free to shoot me down. I don't do flouncing.
Some time ago, the 'What does Gransnet mean to you?'thread developed into a 'Bring back jingl' campaign. Despite this, it has become clear that we are not entitled to an explanation as to why she is still shackled to the naughty step
We inhabit a goldfish bowl which must be respectable to the outside world looking in on an ageing cyber community. Old people are only expected to be curmudgeonly in books and TV nonsense. Manufactured threads about growing old disgracefully are perfectly acceptable so long as they fit the approved template which has been set by people who are NOT as old as we are.
All well and good until a situation causes a ding-dong. We must be ever mindful that Gransnet is a business relying on advertising revenue. Swearing is tolerated on Mumsnet because it's acceptable in the young and feisty whereas the 'one foot in the grave' club have to leave all that behind and remember our opinions don't really count any more.
The political threads are argumentative because that's politics. You can't put a straight jacket on a well informed if opiniated point of view which is as it should be. Folk who hide behind the sofa when all hell breaks loose should know better than to get caught in the cross-fire.
So....We're allowed to moan about Brexit, complain about our aches and pains and chat about telly dramas/adverts/music. We willingly offer support to complete strangers even though it often comes back to bite us. I'm not the only one who can spot a set-up. Above all, we must remain bland!
There were two members who railed against this. One is sadly no longer with us and the other has been kicked into touch for being too outspoken. Unsurprisingly, they rarely saw eye to eye but that's LIFE!
I'm off to put the joint in the oven. I might even start a thread about it.
Thanks for another chuckle, alima (another cos something on another thread made me chuckle too today; I've forgotten what already; passing chuckle-moments are the spice of life).
Good idea, alima. At least we'd be forewarned. Anya, I appreciate that. But surely we are all "old bags together" and have enough strife in our lives without fighting on here?well, I am an old bag.
Don't think there's much chance of that wot. Some seem to thrive on animosity. We've got a friendly, cosy, comforting thread in Soop's kitchen. Conversely, could we have one representing the darker side and call it Hell's Kitchen. Anyone fancying a rant, slagging off etc could visit with impunity. Clear orf yer wizened old trout, yer talking through the top of yer 'ead! F...wit! You know, that sort of thing. Bit like the Politics thread but designated nastiness.
There is a line between being free to have an opinion on a subject and using that freedom as licence to rubbish someone else. You have crossed that line more than once, shanma
"I have never been a member of the Communist Party, I am not now a member, I cannot imagine becoming a member, and I do not sympathize with the Communist principles and procedures to which the Regents and you and, I am sure, the faculty are opposed." Eat your heart out Arthur Miller. We will be having GN witch hunts next.
I didn't call anyone names!¬ You obviously have not read my posts properly Jalima. If you can show me where I have done this then show it to me, you will not find it.