Eugenie moving into Kensington Palace

Exactly Anniebach

We don't get the windsors in Wales so definitely no Royal hunters

.

Tourists come to London to see the historic buildings, the galleries and museums. How many come to see the royals? Hardly any I would bet, despite what royalists say. I have seen the Queen about twice and I have lived in London for 60 years.

Whilst I agree that we cannot choose the family we are born into we can choose to do the right thing with wealth and privilege we have been given.
The age old quote that the royals encourage tourism into the country surely only applies to London . I don't think you would find many any "Royal hunters" in the NE of England ( or most other parts of the country for that matter) .

I am a Royalist but do agree that Andrew & his Daughters are very pretentious. Princess Anne chose not to have titles for her children & they've turned out pretty well. Prince Charles as heir to the throne had no choice although both William & Harry used the surname Wales during their Army career & William uses Wales when working for Air Ambulance.

Regarding "grace & favour" property what about the properties available to Prime Minister etc, how much does their security cost? Why are we still paying for security for Tony Blair?

Others have mention the Duchy of Cornwall but not the fact that the Queen receives income from the Duchy of Lancaster which is held in Trust for the Monarch - I would need to research the amount paid to the Government & the amount returned to the Queen but I believe the cost to each person in the UK is approx 60p

Sorted, thank you Jalima ?

Yes, and I can heave a sigh of relief, and yes, this £1 was beginning to feel like a millstone in my pocket.

Jalima, this pound is now a millstone, how about in a Salvation Army tin ? I know they care for the homeless, I did a soup run with them for several winters

Difficult, Alexandra and Katherine Kent did a lot of public duties , far more than the young ones do now

Perhaps now is the time to do a bit of weeding out of the 'Royals'. Breeding has gone well so only protection etc for the core family now, the Queen and husband, Charles and wife, Prince William and Harry, plus their children. All the lesser relations to look after themselves now we have plenty, or be paid by the jobs carried out on the Royal firms behalf. Those that are now too infirm to work tally up the jobs and duties they did in the past and that would be their pension credits. Fair we are apparently all in this together.

Are you suggesting I have to go to London annie?
I'm a country bumpkin

I didn't know they were on benefits , do you mean pension credits for the queenie , Phillip and all her cousins and the younger on unemployment benefit, William works part time so working tax credit?

Jalima, perhaps the pound coin over the railing of Buck house?

Of course they work hard. I've heard that Camilla and Charles are like many GPs looking after George and Charlotte while William and Kate go back to full time employment. Meantime Harry is taking good care of his GGF Philip and making sure Queenie is properly looked after. Not to mention the work in charity shops being undertaken by Andrew and his daughters. (Unfortunately the shop had to refuse the outfits they donated on the grounds that no one else would ever wear them!)

My state pension is classed as 'a benefit' even though I wrote a letter of protest to the then Pensions Secretary saying that I had jolly well earned it.

Yes, I think lots of Gransnetters do plenty for others, their families and society in general.

What a lot of jealous cats! ! How many of you are on benefits or do anything for others. The Royals work hard.

I have not read the thread thoroughly enough, obviously

Yes, I know anyone can put anything they like on Wikipedia, but it was the fixated that was questionable.

I could find other sources but that was the easiest (and laziest ) and probably totally irrelevant to the OP!

(Nothing gransnetters like better than a good arguement about the royals).

Thanks MaizieD!

No, I posted wikipedia links, too. I am aware that it is not the most reliable source of information but it had a lot of stuff collected in one place.

I think the govt. document I linked to should be perfectly reliable, though. Which did confirm much of what was in the wiki links.

I didn't think Ginny42 was being rude; just suggesting caution.

However, the message does not seem to be getting home. The Queen & her extended family aren't living at our expense.

Just to say don't be so fixated on information on Wikipedia
Ginny42 if that is addressed to me (the only Wikipedia link on here, so it must be) that is extremely rude

fixated on information on Wikipedia - what evidence do you have that I am fixated on it?

For your information, the 'evidence' is out there if you search the history books and can follow a family tree.
There was also an extremely interesting BBC programme where the family line was traced to the previous Earl in Australia.

However, they would probably have remained Roman Catholics or had their heads chopped off for other spurious reasons, so HM has no need to worry.

I know the argument about the revenue the Royal family brings in always comes up in these discussions, but I would very much like to see a balance sheet.

Oh, this really bugs me - I am a Republican and object to Royalty anyway - no of course she shouldn't go and live in Kensington Palace at our expense - what fools we are to allow all this - they've plenty of money and the Queen should do what we all do - help with the deposit to buy a place of their own - simple!!

Just to say don't be so fixated on information on Wikipedia. Its own disclaimer states, information on Wikipedia is contributed by anyone who wants to post material, and the expertise of the posters is not taken into consideration. It can in fact be used by people who delibertely post misinformation.

Some information on Wikipedia may well be accurate, but because entries are not reviewed by experts it's only really useful for familiarising yourself with basic information.

I don't mind the royals in the top ranks but i don't like the lesser royals intheir silly frocks and fergie looking like a scruff bag and there is something about Andrew and his lot that is very unappealing .irritating and unnecessary in my view