Gransnet forums

Chat

Dedicated argument thread

(143 Posts)
whitewave Sat 28-May-16 08:27:59

? thought that would be a good idea. So if someone is annoying you and you wish to say so perhaps rather than ruining the conversation you could refer the person to whom you wish to have a go at to this thread and then you could argue to your hearts content, being a pain in the ass to everyone else.

This is going to be so popular I just know it is??????????

GandTea Sun 29-May-16 17:14:26

"SORRY" ??? that word has no place on this thread, go for it tell Jings that she is talking out of her @@@@@.

Christinefrance Sun 29-May-16 16:41:46

Sorry Jings it's not pretty, looks like a mini dress with frilly drawers

GandTea Sun 29-May-16 16:25:01

I hate to go off topic by being serious for a moment. I have loved this thread, several of the posters have been at logger heads with me and visa versa, On here we have engaged in some pleasant light hearted banter, just what the doctor ordered. flowers to you all.

Ok, back to the bickering now.

Elegran, I cannot agree about your body rub, chocolate and strawberry jam is much better, although it does make a mess of the sheets -- oops, should this be on a different thread ?

rosesarered Sun 29-May-16 14:05:18

Elegran loved your last post on previous page.grin I think I took part in that research and was one of the subjects who didn't survive.

whitewave Sun 29-May-16 14:04:52

grin

Alea Sun 29-May-16 14:03:48

The style is known as "It will end in tiers"

Alea Sun 29-May-16 14:02:46

I think her unmentionables frillies are showing.
"New knicker elastic, Ma'am?"

Lona Sun 29-May-16 13:58:27

I think it's absolutely hideous and would look much better with chocolate dribbled down the front! My t shirts usually do.

whitewave Sun 29-May-16 13:25:33

The more you look at it the worse it gets.The top not layered bit doesn't go with the bottom layered (not trousers) bit.

GandTea Sun 29-May-16 11:43:55

JBF, now I have an image of you with bright red hair and black patent thigh boots grin. Definitely better than the loo roll look.

trisher Sun 29-May-16 11:36:04

I think she tried it on said "Can't wear that it's too short," so they added a couple of extra bits at the bottom for her. Toilet roll cover? Well -yes!!

jinglbellsfrocks Sun 29-May-16 11:34:32

If some of us can dye our hair bight red, or wear unusual boots, why can't she wear a dress of her choice without us commenting negatively? Us and them situation.

GandTea Sun 29-May-16 11:26:06

GandTea - G&T - Gin and Tonic, but with Tea rather than tonic. get it now, sheess, some people. Time for a real G&T wine

Toilet roll cover, well that does not give much scope for argument.

Jenty61 Sun 29-May-16 11:18:43

looks like she is modelling a toilet roll cover!

jinglbellsfrocks Sun 29-May-16 10:44:33

Oh shit flip! I've made this into a thread about a thread. The whole lot will get deleted now. If They notice. hmm

jinglbellsfrocks Sun 29-May-16 10:43:08

Please argue.

jinglbellsfrocks Sun 29-May-16 10:42:46

I think this dress turns into trousers a few tiers down. whitewave thinks it's just a dress. And I think it's pretty. Others say it's not.

trisher Sun 29-May-16 10:26:48

GandTea I absolutely disagree that no-one can agree.

whitewave Sun 29-May-16 10:24:37

grandtea how dare you contradict me!

GandTea Sun 29-May-16 10:12:31

You lot are bloody loopy - calls the men in white coats (apart from the chocolate stains)

Elegran Sun 29-May-16 09:57:39

That report wasn't conducted scientifically, tessa.

Where are the accounts of the subjects being randomly selected from a representative sample of all ages, genders, species and ethnic origins, political affiliations and newspaper preferences? Were those administering the dose aware of who was getting which strength, thus potentially having an unconsciuos bias in their interpretation of results?

Where does it mention whether any control subjects were deprived of any of this powerful medication entirely (and whether there are plans to add it to the list of NGS-approved medication so that everyone can benefit from it, carefully prescribed and monitored, of course)?

Where is the blow-by-blow description of how the chemicals were measured, mixed and administered? Come to that, how were they administered at all? Orally? Intravenously? Rectally? Nasally?

A far better study is the one by Fudgit and Quack, who showed incontrovertibly that they got better results by rubbing a mixture of paraffin, beeswax, and mayonnaise (Hellman's) over the entire body of 1,684 subjects than by administering this orally to 1,625 carefully matched volunteers. 83% of the cutaneous subjects survived, against 27% of the oral ones. There were no cases of beri-beri, dengue fever or athletes foot in any of the surviving subjects. Those who did not survive were not examined due to the over-enthusism of one assistant who summoned a funeral director before informing the principle researcher.

GandTea Sun 29-May-16 09:52:29

Oh for heavens sake WW, it is awful, no one can agree.

whitewave Sun 29-May-16 09:42:12

This threads going well isn't it?

dramatictessa Sat 28-May-16 23:26:45

You're all wrong. The latest report on chocolate is that half a bar mixed with 500 mls formaldehyde will protect you from getting hives, flea bites, nips from horses and rashes from walking in grass. But, a quarter of a bar mixed with 250 mls formaldehyde will give you hives on your backside, guarantee flea bites up your nostrils, a horse in your living room, and a nasty rash every time you go in your garden. If you don't believe me, here's the link to the report anotherloadofstatisticsmadeuptoscareyou.12345*#/789^!#@45. Anyone want to argue with me? wink

Galen Sat 28-May-16 23:01:54

I don't want knuts or nuts!
I want! *I DEMAND* chocolate with caramel ! ( although, having just a a square of darling daughter's malteser chocolate? )