The great dog/cat controversy

Duncan did.

We still don't know who had lamb for dinner?

No, I'm a... No comment

A danger to the safety of DOGS, more like....(mutter)

when are you saying you are danger to the safety of the realm?

I put it to the court that I am unfit to plead through reasons of insanity

That's the trouble with the law these days - nowhere near pedantic enough!
People are riding roughshod over our legal system signing false fanciful statements with false slightly inaccurate names....[pompous emoticon]

Yeah - it's that what you said. I can't be taken into consideration - cheers jeni

Unless you are prepared to reveal it in open court, it can't be taken into consideration, unless divulgence would prove a danger to the realm.[stern judicial emoticon]

My statement was ripped up by an angry investigator (*Anagram*) so here is my signed statement again

Signed: Iamnearly64 (talk about pedantic!)

No comment

.....where's the new info then?

Aha! But you're not, yet, are you when? That's flagrant fraudery!

I have been advised to sign my statement!

Signed bollocks whenIm64

Keep up, Bags! I still maintain Duncan singed his own backside while attempting to alleviate a virulent itch! Probably caught while sheep-rustling...

That sounds suspicious

bagsouch!

No comment

Cui bono is what we should be looking at!
Was it Donald who ran off with BBQ? Or did someone else take it to eat at home?
Who had lamb to eat that night?

'No comment!'

when is that your statement?

but I thought it was soop and nellie who were doing all the singing!!!!

It wasn't duncan! He's the dog! Really, nag, get your head straight.

Oh, but that was thhe question wasn't it? maybe he singed himself.

No comment!

who is your lawyer, when? [suspicious emoticon]

It's DUNCAN!!!