Grandmabatty
Pokiticsnerd, you have no idea what efforts my school went to in order that children achieved their goals and I find your assumption rude. The school I worked at had a huge number of children with multiple deprivations and free school meals entitlement as well as a number of well heeled, middle class families. There were (and still are) some parents who could not let their children do anything, to the extent that they did their homework for them and filled in UCAS forms for them etc. These were a minority but nevertheless still there. I am very proud of how my school supports children all the way through to do what is best for them. They have been praised nationally for achievements and how most children have positive pathways, whether it's university, college, apprenticeship or work. I have worked with children who have feckless parents or who live in extreme poverty and seen how hard the school worked to help those children escape their background. Don't presume to sneer at my school when you know nothing about it
What assumption was that Grandmabatty. (I notice you didn't "learn" to address people by their chosen name by the way. Wouldn't that be considered "rude" in your world?)
You seem to think I was critising you, or teachers in general. I wasn't, it's never all about teachers as they work within a system. However, it is about education and what we provide and did provide for children and young people. Teachers have never be responsible for choosing how schools are funded and, in many cases go above and beyond from their own resources. Nevertheless, I do find it arrogant to blame parents and children who have even less control over what they are offered.
Education (for life) has long been underfunded. School days are short and extra-curriculum activities are not always possible. If you want children to understand the wider world and approach it confidently they need these. They will then have a chance to make better choices.