MrsMoneyPenny
Thank you vampirequeen. I think that's the problem, we have set boundaries which DC are perfectly happy with and know our rules. It's not like that in their own home, that's why when they get taken back all hell lets loose but parents don't see this or maybe don't agree with boundaries, I'm not sure on this one tbh. Only yesterday when they were here for lunch the youngest one ALWAYS tries to skip main part of lunch to get to sweet treat. He tries this with us but he knows the rules, finish off your main and you will get your sweet and complies with no problems. What happened yesterday well mummy was here and was allowed to skip main to have sweet. I reminded them all of 'our' house rules and was told 'perhaps that's not the best rule to have'. I was dumb-struck and he was allowed sweet.
I think 2 quite different concepts are confused here.
Of course you'd politely correct your GC, ask them to be kind - not rude. We correct our GC, kindly, no matter their age if we're babysitting.
If Mum or Dad is with us - all discipline falls to parents.
In the lunch example, Mum was in attendance - she rightly made a decision to what her children eat, in what order. Not your choice.
IMO, 'perhaps that's not the best rule to have' isn't rude - factual.
Apart from that - many people don't believe in bribing children with treats. Mum didn't make us 'clean our plates' just served the foods, asked us to sit quietly until everyone was finished.
Recent thread: some believed children should be fed what they like. IMO, they should have a wide variety (main, veggies, fruit, bread, dessert). Children eat what they fancy on their plate, eating dessert with everyone.