Saxifrage, I was livid with a major animal charity for a similar reason. Dh was executor for a friend who left the house where he’d been living with his wife, to the charity. She was well provided for in other ways, inc. another house, and wouldn’t have stayed in that house anyway, but was allowed to stay for up to 3 years.
The solicitor who drew up the will advised leaving the house itself to the charity, rather than the proceeds of the sale. He said otherwise the charity might well hassle the widow over why hadn’t it sold yet, why hadn’t it sold for more money, etc. He’d known it to happen.
Dh was in contact with the charity early on, so they knew the score. All they had to do when the time came, was to let the solicitors transfer ownership and give the keys to an estate agent.
Many months after they knew the score, they wrote to the widow, my friend, basically saying, ‘Oh, it’d be easier for us if you could just sell it for us and give us the cash, thanks very much.’
As if the widow didn’t have enough to cope with, getting rid of mountains of stuff, arranging a move, etc. The letter put her in a terrible tizz.
I’d have written a seriously stroppy letter back. Dh’s was more measured but still very plain spoken, and we heard no more about it. But I still can’t get over the blatant cheek of it!