I am planning to take a week out from my holiday with my family in New Zealand to go snorkeling on Fiji. I have had a quote from an agent for one resort,which would cost about £1,500 for a week. The reviews on Trip Advisor and Lonely Planet say this resort is very busy with hordes of 'rowdy children'. I have had another island recommended on a snorkeling forum which sounds like paradise. Only eight villas, they meet you at Nadi airport and take you in their own fast boat to the island, three meals a day, and a luxury villa. I would have to arrange my own flights from Auckland to Nadi, the main airpor for Fiji. The total cost would be about £2,500. The coral is wonderful from all the islands of Fiji, so it is just the accommodation and tranquility that make the difference.
I am 72 and I have enough in my travel fund. I was disappointed last year in Phuket when the coral had all been destroyed. I spend very little for the rest of the year.
I don't need to save for my future as my pension income is guaranteed and I have no mortgage and no debts.
So why do I feel it would be wrong to go for the more expensive option?
Good Morning Friday 26th June 2026
Hundreds of illegal migrants to be put in existing military barracks
GB News wins award for Best News Channel for 4th year running








