Gransnet forums

TV, radio, film, Arts

Pointless

(55 Posts)
Bogoff Thu 07-May-15 18:39:21

We used to like pointless, but the childish banter between the presenters is starting to ruin the show for us. Has anyone else noticed it and/or annoyed by it. Or is it us just getting grumpy.

pompa Sat 09-May-15 10:37:07

Rosannie. "That's the point Pompa" at first I didn't understand this as you are in near total agreement with me. It was the predictability etc of pointless that was my gripe.
THEN I realised that I may be confusing everyone, halfway through this thread I changed my name (it's a long story) From Bogoff to Pompa, so it was me that started the thread.

Hope that clarifies things, or perhaps it's now more confusing. smile

pompa Sat 09-May-15 10:38:50

Rather it was GNHQ that changed my name, hence I didn't have control over when it happened.

Rosannie Sat 09-May-15 11:26:18

Yes confused! Were you not Pompa on the 7th May then? Or were you acting as a double agent?
Anyway, the point is ...... Pointless is annoying!
By the way, was Bogoff deemed to be offensive?

annodomini Sat 09-May-15 11:28:39

I enjoy Pointless but there is nothing spontaneous about Alexander Armstrong. He says exactly the same things to every pair of contestants and it really irritates me. He was a pretty good presenter on HIFNFY last week. That's also scripted but it has to vary from week to week and there is room for spontaneirty. Richard's other quiz show - can't remember the name - gives him scope to chat with contestants. I prefer his personaity to Alexander's.

hildajenniJ Sat 09-May-15 11:48:57

I don't know why Alexander Armstrong doesn't do more singing! He gas a lovely bass baritone voice. I heard him recently on Classic FM.
I like Pointless, I can now tell from what AA says in the pointless final, whether the contestants have won the jackpot or not. He is very predictable.

hildajenniJ Sat 09-May-15 11:49:57

What, "gas", I meant has of course.

pompa Sat 09-May-15 15:09:53

Rosannie, please check your PM's

AshTree Sat 09-May-15 15:26:20

I didn't think we were able to change our user names just like that? Thought we had to delete our profile and start a new one. Or have I got that wrong?

pompa Sat 09-May-15 15:34:58

Ash tree, you are quite correct, GNHQ did it for me. You cannot do it yourself, you cannot delete your account, and it is against the Forum rules to have two identities. GNHQ were aware of the situation and history all along.

AshTree Sat 09-May-15 15:40:36

Ah, thanks Pompa smile. It would be confusing if people could change their identities willy-nilly - you'd never really be sure who you were talking to confused

rosesarered Sat 09-May-15 15:43:16

I must admit, I know nothing about anything remotely techie on the Internet
Didn't even know you could change your name, but a clued up friend of ours who stayed for a couple of days recently was telling me about all her Internet forums Or should I say fora.She is on about seven!One is enough for me. she mentioned a thing called ( hilariously) sock puppets, where somebody manages to have multiple accounts in order to agree with themselves.She swears it's a real thing ( after we fell about laughing) has anyone heard of this?Now we don't know who is real and who is not!Perhaps the Gnet mods are onto this and it cannot happen here?Echoes of the Queen song ' is this the real life, or is this just fantasy?'grin

Ana Sat 09-May-15 15:51:23

It would be possible, in theory, wouldn't it? You'd only need access to two (or more) different internet accounts, a friend or relative, for example. Then I suppose after you'd set up your IDs on here you could just use one PC or whatever for both names. Or would GNHQ be able to tell? confused

pompa Sat 09-May-15 16:00:26

HQ can see the IP address you are posting from, so could identify illegal accounts. Where say a husband/wife are using the same computer, they would need to advise the moderators to prevent problems.
Some forums will automatically delete duplicate accounts unless they are told first.

Ana Sat 09-May-15 16:04:28

OK, so you could only posts from one address at a time. You could still have two or more accounts, though. Some GNetters seem to think they would be able to recognise the fact that two posters were one and the same, but I expect it depends how clever the double poster was...

Ana Sat 09-May-15 16:05:39

You could post as A. while visiting your aged parent in Town A. and also post as B. from your own address in Town B.

pompa Sat 09-May-15 16:10:27

Yes probably, but not sure what the point would be. Dual accounts are more common on games where each character can help the other.
Several people twigged that Bogoff was Pompa, I could have been more elusive, but there are not many men on here anyway.

rosesarered Sat 09-May-15 16:12:13

Yes, or if you still work, from your office? anyway, don't know if it can be done or not, Pompa, you could have kept Bogoff as your sock puppet!

Ana Sat 09-May-15 16:13:46

I was just saying that it could be done, athough I don't know why anyone would want to unless it was to cause trouble!

Nothing to do with you, pompa, or others who leave and come back later with a different name.

rosesarered Sat 09-May-15 16:13:56

I didn't twig Pompa, in fact did not notice you had gone so didn't make any connections. we all go on holiday or are away due to illness at times.

rosesarered Sat 09-May-15 16:14:49

No, as Ana says, this is a different thing entirely to legit changing your name with HQ.

rosesarered Sat 09-May-15 16:16:22

I was just interested in hearing if anyone else had heard of this, or my friend was misinformed.

rosesarered Sat 09-May-15 16:17:37

You have all been brilliant contestants! grin

rosesarered Sat 09-May-15 16:19:05

Though you didn't find that elusive pointless answer, so you don't win any money.

Ana Sat 09-May-15 16:19:51

From Wikipedia

'A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term, a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock, originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community who spoke to, or about, themselves while pretending to be another person.

The term now includes other misleading uses of online identities, such as those created to praise, defend or support a person or organization, or to circumvent a suspension or ban from a website. A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer. Many online communities attempt to block sockpuppets.'

rosesarered Sat 09-May-15 16:28:56

WOW, as Alex Armstrong might say, thanks Ana, so it is real after all.