Nelliem
You little minx , CSL
I'm a bit stuck! What would you do?
Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
I managed to catch a bit of the of the second part (daughters) and the third (sons) and wonder if any of you agree what monster parents she and Prince Albert made?
While Bertie was still a baby he was deemed "retarded" and as a toddler he was unfavourably compared with Vicky, his older sister who at the age of 4 was reading French and learning Latin (poor little beggar). Queen Victoria did not like any of her children as babies, except briefly "Affie" (Alfred) as looking like Albert and poor Leopold who was constantly expected to die young and "pure" as he suffered from haemophilia.He was left to the tender mercies of John Brown's sadistic son who used to hit him with spoons around the face, lock and bully him. The poor young man only "escaped" briefly to study at Oxford (I think) but was allowed to go there "only to study - not to enjoy it". She constantly interfered and attempted to control their lives both as adolescents and adults - even after Bertie and Alexandra were married she decreed how long Alexandra might ride her horse in the park .She gave the Prince of Wales no preparation for kingship or access to any political documents. As for her total hypocrisy regarding Bertie's (admittedly) racy private life - while Albert was alive he and Victoria were at it like rabbits - indeed I understand one of the reasons she dislike pregnancy and small babies, was that these kept her out of bed with Albert!! She was a whingeing, self-pitying woman from start to finish - did you see her in Bertie and Alexandra's wedding photo? Dressed in black sitting between them and staring moodily at a bust of Albert over to one side. What a MIL from hell!! Comments have been made here or elsewhere about the (at times) dysfunctional family which is the House of Windsor - but is it any wonder??
If you don't hear from me for a bit, it is probably because I have been sent to the Tower 
Nelliem
You little minx , CSL
I think Victoria had spent holidays on the I of W as a child and loved it. She certainly never wanted to leave it.
I was trying to think of the name of Osborne House as I was going to mention it. Can't help but feel that was Albert's influence/idea.
I think most historians now agree that Albert didn't die of typhoid fever. Some think he had stomach cancer and some Crohn's disease.
Not suggesting it was anything to do with his death, but has anyone else read the book about how many Victorians were killed quickly or slowly by arsenic poisoning in green pigment in wallpapers, paint etc?
I often wonder how much illness and debilitation was down to contaminated foods and poor diet.
I think one thing that was good about V and A's treatment of their children was how they had a lot of freedom at Osborne with outdoor games, vegetable plots to tend etc. Quite unusual I think. They were certainly unusual in rearing nine live children.
He actually sound like quite a dear person.
There was a comment somewhere that Albert suffered already from stomach troubles well before he got the typhoid which killed him. It sounds too as though he was a perfectionist, so he would have worried about details and produced a lot of stomach acid. Keeping up with Victoria in the bedroom as well as in daily decisions, and combatting the politicians who resented his influence would not have helped. The poor man was worn out.
crimson do you think it was her constant demands that finished him off, rather than Bertie's misdemeanours. I think John Brown died relatively young as well 

, crimson!
Wonder if her constant physical demands were a bit too much for him and, with her being the Queen and all that he couldn't say he 'had a headache'
...
I watched all of the episodes one after the other on i-Player last night. It was mentioned that Victoria and Albert were so passionate about each other and enjoyed their sexual relationship immensely. It was said that neither had any idea about how to prevent children being conceived, so their babies were born in quick succession. Victoria seemed to see her children as a rather irritating nuisance, and something that was more an inconvenience to her relationship with Albert. She really did seem to be 'not a very nice woman', and very emotionally needy. If Albert had lived to be an older man things with the family may have been very different, perhaps.
Isn't it strange that she resented her children, rather than he did? Is it not often more the case that the father sees the children as the barrier between he and his wife? 
nonu The idea of a picture of her "hanging" on your landing is interesting!
You must have really disliked her!

The thread on Mumsnet is in AIBU and is entitled "To think Queen Victoria was a nutter". It is very interesting with some particularly informed comment particularly towards the end.
There has been a parallel thread on Mumsnet, where people have quoted from letters which show a completely different side to the relationships, especially with her daughters. Also, someone on there pointed out that the death of Alice was hardly mentioned in the programme, probably because Victoria was distraught with grief for her for ages and that didn't fit the hypothesis. I still think it was a biased and incomplete picture, distorted through a modern lens. I don't doubt the views of the individual experts and I admire Juliet Gardiner and Miranda Carter particularly, but I think the programme was edited to be sensationalist and fit a particular, extreme viewpoint, when the truth (whatever historical truth means) is always much more complex and nuanced. (And as I said before, I am no fan of Victoria).
Having seen that documentary Queen Vic seems to have been a dreadfully dysfunctional mother. Emotional abuse comes to mind.
I don't think that's the reason young mothers don't bottlefeed now, Deedaa!
I think it's partly that it went out of fashion, and also that a lot of women have to go back to work so quickly after having a baby. I've never heard any woman say they regard their breasts as exclusively for the pleasure of their partner!
I was rather struck by the idea of her daughter reading Darwin and Karl Marx - didn't really fit in with Victoria's Camelot ideals did it? The suggestion that she didn't breastfeed because her breasts were for Albert's pleasure surprised me. I thought that was quite a recent concept, hence all the young girls who bottle feed now. What a nightmare to live with though!
I've just watched the programme about the daughters. The way she tried to stop Vicky and Alice breastfeeding was appalling. She was really horrid about babies too. However, the princesses became strong and influential women in their own right, in spite of - or was it because of?- her attempts to control them. Did her behaviour make them stronger?
It is so hard to make a judgement as clearly the choice of extracts from V's letters was intended to reflect her troubled relationship with her children. For all I know there may have been other affectionate entries. However - to write some of the things that she did about her children is mind-boggling and deeply unmaternal! No wonder the poor royal family has troubles with history like that.
I know it's sort of obvious but sometimes I have to remind myself that people in the past were actually in 'their' present and that things were happening around them that must have made them marvel; discoveries and theories and dinosaur bones and stuff.
I know, crimson isn't it such a shame that it was destroyed - it must have been out of this world!
I watched all three and found it fascinating yet cruel, especially the treatment of poor Leopold.
I so wanted to see the series but couldn't watch it for three nights running. Hope it's repeated. It's reminded me that there's a new Stephen Poliakof starting soon. I did enjoy The Lost Prince, but thought he lost his way after that [no pun intended].I am fascinated by that time, though. If I could go back in time it would be to go to The Great Exhibition.
Merlot , I like it , LOL
Or if she liked a little something with it she could ask for water on the knee!
nonu Apparently she thought it was the only way to achieve good health. Goodness knows how she managed to do it.
but after Albert's death she could have invented 'Knees Up Mother Brown' 
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.