Just a few years into our marriage (and this was 13 years ago) my husband was unhappy and left our marriage. He moved back home with his parents. His mum didn't agree with what he had done, and we kept in touch. She would even come and have lunch with me every week when she did her shopping. After some months we reconciled (the day of the decree nisi was the day he admitted to himself that actually he didn't want to be apart, although it was some months later before we finally got back properly on track. And I need to say that in our case the bad times came after the death of my beloved mother, and our differing ways of dealing with that death, was the reason we split, not because the grass was greener elsewhere, so I do see that there are differences). I found out - from him - early into that reconciling process that while apart, his girlfriend had been to their house, and his folks had also attended her birthday party. Initially I felt utterly betrayed, as she had always sided with me, and i thought she had just been being two-faced. However, when I calmed down and thought about it I realised that, in her position, i might well have done the same thing - we might never have got back together, the divorce might have gone through and he might even have gone on to marry her. She might have been a permanent feature in mum-in-law's life forever, and however MIL felt about his behaviour, or even the girlfriend, she loves her son, and couldn't risk losing him because she wouldn't accept the new person. I would say that in our case there was no other person actually involved when we broke up, she came later, so it isn't quite the same. However, in defence of your son's new partner, I don't feel it is fair to put all the blame on her. Yes she was single, with no children, and arguably less to lose. But it does feel like you might be conveniently shifting the blame all onto her to avoid being very angry at your son and having to confront, and thus risk losing, him, whereas from outside the situation it may look different: he is a grown man, and he has a mind of his own. He didn't get the new partner pregnant and feel he needed to support her out of guilt or responsibility, he just chose to leave his marriage and be with her. At that point, even if the new woman had felt conscience-bound to say that she couldn't break up his marriage to be with him, can you be absolutely certain that your son wouldn't have still left his wife anyway? I think any blame should be spread a bit more evenly. And I think it wouldn't hurt to meet her, either. At the very least you could then judge for yourself what you really think her character is, and whether you think you could grow to accept her in time. Perhaps you could speak to your DIL first, explaining that you still support her, still don't condone your son's behaviour, and dont plan on welcoming the new one with open arms, but that he is still your son, and ultimately you don't want to lose him?
From sinner to saint, quite a transformation.
Last letters make new words - Series 3


Mind you, she met & tolerated DiL2 & never said anything directly to me, but the message got through!
