Gransnet forums

News & politics

7 PMs in a decade 😬

(15 Posts)
Fallingstar Mon 20-Jul-26 12:53:53

Well good luck to the latest PM but right now it does seem to be a case of ‘rinse and repeat’ with me wondering how long Burnham will last.
Have never seen a period in my lifetime when as many PMs came and went and it definitely isn’t good for the country.
Is it because Brexit caused such political upheaval/damage that in the aftermath governing the country has become too difficult due to bitter divisions caused by populist politicians and tin pot policies aimed only at appealing to people’s prejudices??
Or are there just no politicians of the calibre needed to govern the country as previous PMs did?
Is the whole system to blame? With unelected groups pulling the government’s strings??
Interested to hear what others think is the reason further this and perhaps how it could be rectified.
Personally am at a loss.

Fallingstar Mon 20-Jul-26 12:54:44

*reason for this

Coronation Mon 20-Jul-26 12:58:25

The media don't help calling for resignations all the time.

M0nica Mon 20-Jul-26 12:59:54

The David Cameron of the Labour party. He can talk the talk, Can he walk the walk?

Calendargirl Mon 20-Jul-26 13:02:05

M0nica

The David Cameron of the Labour party. He can talk the talk, Can he walk the walk?

Well, we shall see, shan’t we?

I hope he can make some changes for the better.

ronib Mon 20-Jul-26 13:03:32

What is obvious is that Burn’em has plotted to overthrow Starmer so let’s hope it was all for the good. Burn’em went to a lot of trouble to take control.

Cossy Mon 20-Jul-26 13:05:18

Well, I’m sad to see the back of Starmer. He, in my view, was quite badly treated and should have been allowed to finish the job he was given.

However, we are where we are. Words are meaningless, let’s see what actions follow these words.

We simply have to give him a chance, we have no choice.

fancythat Mon 20-Jul-26 13:10:35

Coronation

The media don't help calling for resignations all the time.

They keep digging up stuff.
Not just leaders but those around them too. Which doesnt at all help their case.
Especially if they "stand by them".

Personally, I think 7 PMs is mainly down to lack of morals.
[though I probably need a refresher course in why 7 PMs have gone. I had no idea it was that number, and cant think it was all because of how they behaved or how those around them behaved].

Fallingstar Mon 20-Jul-26 13:12:14

Cossy

Well, I’m sad to see the back of Starmer. He, in my view, was quite badly treated and should have been allowed to finish the job he was given.

However, we are where we are. Words are meaningless, let’s see what actions follow these words.

We simply have to give him a chance, we have no choice.

I agree with you Cossy.
But as you say it is what it is so now we have Burnham, let’s hope he is given a chance to actually do something good for the country and isn’t ousted before he gets a chance. He certainly can talk and so will be much better at communicating to the people what he is achieving whereas Starmer was far more quiet man politically.

westendgirl Mon 20-Jul-26 13:16:41

I agree with you, Cossy. How will Burnham cope with many of the public wanting and expecting things to be put in place yesterday.
I see the media are already sharpening their pencils

Graphite Mon 20-Jul-26 13:16:45

We are where we are. Starmer and Labour were hounded by the media from 5 July 2024 and compounded that by making their own clumsy mistakes. Labour under Starmer did achieve some good things but failed to publicise them sufficiently.

As an old school socialist who just wants a fairer society and thinks it can be done, that we can afford it, Burnham’s speech just now brought tears to my eyes.

An end to rough sleeping and more council houses. Everybody deserves a decent and affordable roof over their head. Start there, fix the inequity over housing and all else follows.

Cossy Mon 20-Jul-26 13:40:21

Graphite

We are where we are. Starmer and Labour were hounded by the media from 5 July 2024 and compounded that by making their own clumsy mistakes. Labour under Starmer did achieve some good things but failed to publicise them sufficiently.

As an old school socialist who just wants a fairer society and thinks it can be done, that we can afford it, Burnham’s speech just now brought tears to my eyes.

An end to rough sleeping and more council houses. Everybody deserves a decent and affordable roof over their head. Start there, fix the inequity over housing and all else follows.

👏👏👏👏👏

Oreo Mon 20-Jul-26 13:46:52

westendgirl

I agree with you, Cossy. How will Burnham cope with many of the public wanting and expecting things to be put in place yesterday.
I see the media are already sharpening their pencils

You mean swords?

Oreo Mon 20-Jul-26 13:49:18

Most new PM speeches are good, but then reality takes over.
At least AB has some vision and passion and I liked what he said.
It can’t all be done without money and I think income tax should go up across the board.

nanna8 Mon 20-Jul-26 13:50:34

I hope he does well, he is likeable and speaks well and just thank goodness someone new is leading. It would have been an absolute nightmare if Starmer had gone to the polls in 2 years, the Labour Party would have just imploded.