Meandrog - you seem to be a Boris fan but he ranks low with the majority- 5th of 7 in 21st Century Prime Ministers.
The Brexit referendum in 2016, under Cameron's government lead to getting the UK out of EU. Cameron resigned- Teresa May followed. Boris succeeded TM and reopened the Brexit withdrawal agreement negotiations. In context of his Brexit poor judgement and poor decisions - in early September 2019 Boris prorogued Parliament- the Supreme Court later rules he did this unlawfully.
Boris then agreed to a revised Brexit withdrawal agreement but he failed to win parliamentary support. So withdrawl negotiations continued until agreed and signed in January 2020.
The pros and cons of the withdrawal agreement and the adverse impact of that on the UK is another matter. It is safe to say that the adverse impact felt by the general population of those terms has lead to the majority of the population now believing the decision to leave the EU was wrong and the UK is worse off.
An interesting comparisons in context of the subject matter of this post: In 2022 Boris appointed Chris Pincher as deputy chief whip whilst he was well aware of sexual misconduct allegations against him. Boris's poor judgement call lead to a massive resignations of members of his government. In comparison, Starmer and those managing the vetting process did not know of the detail of Epstein file information relating to Peter M, released after his appointment. Starmer's government members have not, to date at least, resigned in massive numbers as they did for Boris.
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »
or is it me? It looks quite clear