Casdon 10.57 "I don’t agree LemonJam. This is a monthly poll, not a one off. It measures which of the party leaders the electorate believe offers the most as PM. That will influence their voting in the next general election. It is one of a range of factors, obviously, but to dismiss it is incorrect"
But I didn't say the poll was a "one off poll" Casdon. It provides helpful data in context of this post.
I quote directly from the poll link provided by Lizziedrip: "New data from Ipsos in the UK's Political Pulse survey, taken from the 9th to 12th January, shows when asked to choose between the Labour Party led by Keith Starmer and Reform UK led by Nigel Farage, Labour narrowly leads (39% to 35%). Keith Starmer Head to head: When the public are asked whether Keith Starmer would make a better Prime minister than a host of politicians, he continues to be neck and neck with Nigel Farage (31% vs 31%) and Kemi Badenoch (26% vs 25%)
Starmer leads Health Secretary Wes Streeting by 7 points, former deputy PM Angela Rayner by 13 points, and Green Party leader Zack Polanski by 10 points. Starmer trails Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham by 7 points".
Update- 26th January media reports: "Labour member polling shows that 66% of Labour members thought that Burnham should be allowed to stand. Either way, his status is burnished, members preferring him to Starmer for Labour leader by 48% to 26%. Only he among senior Labour figures scores a positive public rating".
On the basis of the data, I stick with my view, as previously posted, that the important measure is who the public would like to see as Labour leader at the next election to secure a second term. As Andy Burnham is the only senior Labour figure with a positive public rating, I think, along with 66% of Labour members, Burnham should have been allowed to stand.