theworriedwell
If 16 year olds can't vote because they can't go into combat zones should pensioners be able to vote if they are too old to serve?
This is how I feel. People often leap to 'they can't do X so they shouldn't be allowed to do Y', which just makes no sense when X and Y are completely separate things.
16 year olds don't usually earn enough to pay tax. Should being a taxpayer be a condition of voting? They aren't sent into combat zones, but neither were women until 2018. Should we not have had the vote until then, and should it be conditional on having fought for our country?
Things like alcohol are forbidden as they are bad for young bodies - not great for older ones either, but unless we want to restrict freedom of choice it seems sensible to stop people from using it until they are older. I'd rather see it limited to over 25s than allowed for 16 year olds, personally. But either way, it's nothing to do with voting.
Having said all of that, I am not in favour. 18 seems about right to me. Yes, many over 18s have no clue about politics and some 16 year olds are clued up, but on the whole I think 15 is too young.