Mollygo
Funny (peculiar) that this thread should be called spiteful because it’s criticising a Labour MP.
Should all the posted criticisms of the previous government’s MPs be reclassified now?
Are the comments on the thread criticising YC, or the publicity-seeking woman who heckled her? I am as unbiased as anyone on here claims to be*, but I see the thread as being about not very thinly-veiled approval of the stunt. The comments, on the other hand, are largely about the inappropriateness of the disruption of a gesture of goodwill at Christmas that has gone on for decades.
Of course there are the usual complaints that if anyone comments on unpleasantness they are somehow not 'allowing' freedom of speech, as though anyone has the power to 'allow' anything. Most of us have progressed beyond deferring to others for speech and behaviour boundaries, but the idea of being 'allowed' to do or say things by other posters persists.
If it had been Farage in the supermarket, handing out mince pies, would you have been similarly disdainful that he'd been approached and heckled? No? Thought not.
The trope that posters were all in favour of nastiness when it was aimed at Tory politicians is nonsense, and has been from the start of the relentless negativity that started on here before the election. [[https://signal-corridor.live/forums/news_and_politics/1261633-Banning-milkshakes-to-save-Farage Here is a thread that was posted when someone threw milkshake at Nigel Farage. Many posters have changed names, but there is little or no support for disruptive behaviour, even towards such an extreme figure as Farage.
It is not the average poster who is biased in favour of 'their' party - the bias comes from those who say that saying anything other than 'KS and his cabinet are all evil and incompetent' is hypocrisy, and that Labour voters were all in favour of lynching the Tories for the 14 years they were in power. It's just not true.