Iam64
If the people involved with him have concluded Broadmoor is where he should be at this time, surely we accept they’re working professionally. AR has been drawing attention to his personality and mental health issues from a very young age. We have not seen psychiatric or prison reports on his behaviour but we all know he poses a risk to others.
Not supporting the death penalty and not expressing the desire for him to be suffering cruel and unusual punishment does not mean posters are putting his needs before those of his victims.
Not supporting the death penalty and not expressing the desire for him to be suffering cruel and unusual punishment does not mean posters are putting his needs before those of his victims.
I hope people don't really believe we are...
Being against the death penalty in principle does not mean that there's not occasions when, on hearing the details of horrific crimes like that committed by AR, we don't feel a gut-reaction of wishing there'd been instant, summary justice, But gut-reactions do not make good law.
And for those who wish him to be subjected to what is regarded as cruel and inhumane incarceration - or for him to be 'dealt with' by other inmates, two things: if you treat him like a caged animal, he will be a constant danger to any staff who have to come in contact with him. Hoping other violent offenders subject him to beatings is, apart from anything else, encouraging the very acts of violence that landed them in such prisons in the first instance.
The State judiciary system cannot function via a vigilante-mindset, otherwise that's what we'll end up with - vigilantism. Then no-one is safe.
I think maybe there's a misconception that those who oppose the death penalty feel all 'warm and fuzzy' about the rights of murderers when the reality is that upholding a principle can sometimes mean going against your human and natural re-active instincts.


