icanhandthemback
When a child is home-schooled, the parents can be asked to see the work of or the work plan for the child. However, the parents do not have to allow the Home School Officer to see the child or speak to it. This seems incredibly short sighted.
When a Social Worker turns up to see the family, if the child is out, then they go away again. They might make another appointment but often they are very busy. It is hard to blame a SW who is overloaded with cases. Very often the case worker changes too because SW's get burned out.
If the husband was violent, maybe Mum had to leave the children to escape him. That would have gone against her in a court and I suspect that there was a certain amount of PC on the part of the authorities. A steady stream of propaganda against Mum for leaving them might have influenced the children say they didn't want to live with her and the court to give Dad residency.
It is hard to blame a SW who is overloaded with cases. Very often the case worker changes too because SW's get burned out.
Yes, in fairness, laying the blame on social workers is somewhat unjust - there aren't enough of them and they are overburdened, and can only work within the framework of what they are and are not allowed to do.
I think it's the 'ideology' of that framework / system which is part of the problem. I'm sure it's a difficult balance so I'm not underestimating the problem, however if a child is flagged as being at risk of ill treatment or neglect within the family setting, then that family should not have the right to refuse entry to their home by a social worker, and if access is denited - then there has to be an immediate follow-up... this really is one of those instances where if you have nothing to hide, you have no reason not to comply with the request. It's all so easy, fob off the social workers, remove the child from school for home education - or find a suitable excuse - and that child is, effectively, dropped from any scrutiny by any agency - dropped right through the cracks in the system.
It wasn't that long ago that we were commenting on another case of child cruelty - and ultimate death. The little boy dragging his duvet who could barely stand he was so weak, his misery was apparent and heart-rending. And, here we are again, commenting on yet another death of a tortured and beaten child.
It really is now time that the whole system was examined and the emphasis placed on protecting the child - not the sensibilities of the adults,
My son at age three had an undisclosed condition which meant he kept falling over more than was usual for children of his age, and he sustained a hell of a lot of bruises in a short space of time. There were questions asked - of me - and yes, it was uncomfortable, but I kept my cool because I realised why it was necessary. And it also led to the diagnosis of his 'condition'... he had one leg considerably shorter than the other - not noticeable under normal circumstances (and apparently, not uncommon) - which made him lose his balance (no treatment required - the shorter leg caught up with the longer leg eventually).