Wyllow3
She could have actually made it into the opposite, as in "mea culpa", attend the course publicly, and tho there might have been a bit of publicity, "virtue signalled" and made a point of saying how bad she realised speeding was.
but no - she tried to hide it. And got public servants to try.
"Convenience?" My hat.
I very much agree with this.
Far better to have ‘owned up’ at the time, been seen to attend the course (alongside ‘ordinary offenders’).
It could have turned into a real positive, instead it’s prevarication, half truths, dodging the questions….
Honesty is the best policy.
Why can they not realise that?