I would like someone to explain the logic of saying that no, Isla Bryson should not be in a women's jail, but it is ok for intact transwomen to be in female wards in hospital, for instance. If we accept that IB is a risk, we need to ask why that is.
Because he is a sex offender?
What about all the female sex offenders we keep hearing about? Where should they be sent?
Because his offences were against women? What about others who have offended against women?
Or is it because he is a man? What about the other men who say they are women? Why is IB different from them? If the answer is the fact that he is a sex offender, and most men are not, then what about the female sex offenders as mentioned above?
If IB is deemed to be a man who has used the trans loophole to get into a female space, what is stopping other men from doing the same?
These are the questions that many, many women have been asking all along, and whereas it is a disgrace that it has taken the rape of two women to bring this to more general attention, it is a good thing that it has, IMO.