Allsorts
You all want to believe what you want to. Until the actual facts emerge I won’t judge. If these youngsters, we’re just beaten up, that’s appalling and then the officers will be sacked, if the youngsters were throwing punches and aggressive and have a history, we shall find that out too. Too many explosive inaccurate reporting goes on and mud sticks, I wait until the investigation into this is done.
Whose 'actual facts' will you believe, Allsorts?
You have already discounted the mother's telling of the facts. As you weren't there, you don't have your own interpretation of 'the facts', and 'facts' can vary hugely depending on who is interpreting them.
One way to interpret them would be to look at the number of people of colour who have been treated similarly to these boys, and consider whether the colour of their skin might have prompted the police to behave as they did. Another is to assume that the boys must have been doing something wrong, as otherwise the incident wouldn't have happened. Both are judging, but the former is easier to substantiate than the latter, which is based on opinion only.
Also, even if they do have 'a history' of resisting arrest, (which there is no reason to assume), that is no excuse - why would you take that into account at this stage beef 'judging'? It might be considered at sentencing if they are persistent offenders, but the police would have no idea about that at the time of the arrest.