Chewbacca ???
Pigeon Lofts - any words of warning? Thank you
Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
“I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble woman,” Elizabeth I once said to rally her troops to face the Spanish Armada, “but I have the heart and stomach of a king”.
And was a non-binary person too, according to academics working for Shakespeare’s Globe, who have cast doubt on the gender identity of one of England’s greatest queens.
Elizabeth I has been presented as possibly non-binary in an essay published by the theatre, which refers to the female monarch with the gender-neutral “they/them” pronouns.
The essay was written by a “transgender awareness trainer” in defence of the Globe’s decision to stage a new play featuring a non-binary Joan of Arc, but both the play and the essay have raised concerns that famous females are being written out of history.
The essay claims: “Elizabeth I… described themself regularly in speeches as ‘king’, ‘queen’ and ‘prince’, choosing strategically to emphasise their female identity or their male monarchical role at different points.”
This appears to reference the most famous speech attributed to Elizabeth, her 1588 address at Tilbury in which she braced the nation for battle with the Spanish, saying she had the “heart and stomach of king” and “a king of England too”.
‘Historical women adopted a male identity’
The essay on the Shakespeare’s Globe website, written by Dr Kit Heyam, suggests that historical women were not only rebels for performing what were considered typically male tasks, but also in some sense adopted a male identity.
Dr Hayem writes in regard to Elizabeth I as an armour-wearing military leader: “Inhabiting that social role and dressing in the clothes associated with it, while living and working among men, may not just have felt like gendered defiance: it may have had a profound impact on their sense of self.”
The essay defends Shakespeare’s Globe announcing a new play titled I, Joan, in which Joan of Arc is represented as non-binary. The teenage warrior, famed for leading the French against the English in the 100 Years War despite being a woman in a patriarchal society, has been given the pronouns “they/them” in Globe promotional material for the production.
Dr Hayem’s essay for the theatre argues that while historians have stated that Joan wore male armour out of “practicality” during her campings, “they” may have had “deeper motivations” related to “their” identity.
Author JK Rowling signalled her bemusement that Shakespeare’s Globe would be portraying Joan of Arc as non-binary by liking a Twitter post which read: “Coming next: Napoleon was a woman because he was defeated at Waterloo.”
‘Famous females will be written out of history’
Feminist thinkers have raised concerns that casting doubts on the womanhood of prominent women because they defied gender norms, and did supposedly “manly” things, will effectively write many famous females out of history.
Philosopher Dr Jane Clare Jones said: “This is a really great example of the inherent gender conservatism in gender identity ideology. Traditional gender conservatism says that men must do ‘manly’ things, and women must do ‘womanly’ things.
“Gender identity ideology reverses that and then we end up with the idea that anyone who does ‘manly’ things must be a man, and anyone who does ‘womanly’ things must be a woman.
“This is how we end up in a situation in which historical women who have performed traditionally ‘masculine’ roles end up being re-categorised as ‘trans men’ or ‘non-binary’ or ‘not-women’ in some way.
“This is a really regressive message to be sending out, especially to young women.”
‘A regressive ideology’
Joan Smith, author of the feminist volume Misogynies, said: “Women and girls are entitled to reject stereotypes without losing our sex.
“We didn’t have enough female role models to start with, we have spent decades rediscovering women artists, authors, leaders. And now a regressive ideology is trying to take them away.”
Born in 1533, Elizabeth I became England’s longest-serving female monarch until Queen Victoria, and was famed for overseeing the emergence of the country as an international power during her 44-year reign.
Named the Virgin Queen, she never married or had children despite this being the expectations of her contemporaries.
uk.news.yahoo.com/elizabeth-may-non-binary-claims-171338852.html
Chewbacca ???
Chewbacca ???
I love the way gransnetters unequivocally state it is complete bollocks. Hear hear!
I have a strong suspicion that Robert The Bruce and William Wallace were non binary/transgender. Both strong leaders, known for being able to conjure up meals for their troops out of very little and they both wore a skirt!
Well Jesus was a very kind and gentle soul who went about in robes
Aaah, but he lost his rag and chucked the money lenders out of the Temple, thus proving that he was a Real Man after all...
"The Globe Theatre’s move to re-write Joan of Arc’s history is part of a push to promote LGBTQ themes in the performing arts. In New York City, Roundabout Theatre on Broadway has announced that the beloved Broadway musical “1776” will take the stage on an international tour solely depicting the Founding Fathers of the American Revolution by “actors who identify as female, transgender, and non-binary.”"
www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/252027/globe-theatre-joan-of-arc-non-binary-queer-catholic-backlash
For any who haven't seen it, here is the tweet from the Globe Theatre, showing Joan using a binder - something which is also used by 'trans' & 'non-binary' women & girls nowadays and which can be very harmful to their health.
Rosie51
I’m waiting for the Globe ‘scholars’ to non-binary or even transgender a ‘great man’ from the past. I shan’t hold my breath though. Unless they can produce written evidence by the women themselves that they ‘identified’ as non binary they should refrain from appropriating other’s self determination.
Well Jesus was a very kind and gentle soul who went about in robes
Rosie51
Isn’t non binary just self-obsessed people putting others into stereotypical boxes while proclaiming they fit neither?
In my experience yes. Either that or people with neurodiversity or mental health issues usually including social anxiety.
So strong women aren't women at all, but the inconvenient truth that they have female bodies must mean that they are non-binary?
Couldn't it be that they were just strong women doing what women have done for centuries, which is to exist in a man's world doing their best to ignore the gender stereotypes that others attempt to thrust upon them?
Isn’t non binary just self-obsessed people putting others into stereotypical boxes while proclaiming they fit neither?
There have always been a lot of male chefs, haven't there? And cooking is part of a woman's job as house slave homemaker, isn't it? Should we assume that they too are non-binary or trans?
Exactly GagaJo.
The idea that people are really the opposite sex to their real one, or no sex at all, based on their actions etc, is completely ridiculous.
‘Historical women adopted a male identity’
Of course they did because their only other option was to defer to men at all times and to live a restricted, 'womanly' life.
Historical women were always female.
Joan Smith, author of the feminist volume Misogynies, said: “Women and girls are entitled to reject stereotypes without losing our sex.
“We didn’t have enough female role models to start with, we have spent decades rediscovering women artists, authors, leaders. And now a regressive ideology is trying to take them away."
I don't understand the mentality of those who support these trans & non-binary ideas, or those who consider the whole subject boring, unless it is outright misogyny or / and stupidity.
What a load of rubbish. Joan of Arc was a woman, born of a woman and had a father.
Rosalyn69
Who cares? I fed up with the whole gender “thing”.
Me too!!!!
Galaxy
I like Ricky Gervais tweet on this but I cant repeat it here
I’ve seen/ heard it. Brilliant ?
Ilovecheese
“Women and girls are entitled to reject stereotypes without losing our sex."
Yes.
Yes from me too.
I’m waiting for the Globe ‘scholars’ to non-binary or even transgender a ‘great man’ from the past. I shan’t hold my breath though. Unless they can produce written evidence by the women themselves that they ‘identified’ as non binary they should refrain from appropriating other’s self determination.
Boudicca next I guess.
Very irritating of Victoria to have all those children and write in her diary how much she enjoyed sex with Albert.
But then maybe Albert………
women and girls are entitled to reject stereotypes without losing our sex
I want that on a t-shirt.
Which makes sense Ilovecheese
Another theory as to why neither of Henry V111 daughters did not have children is that it was because of his venereal disease.
Looking forward to the OP's response....
Then there’s this theory
‘Although she has gone down in history as the Virgin Queen, upon her accession it was widely expected that Elizabeth would marry. But as she continued to resist pressure from her councillors to take a husband, rumours began to circulate that there was some secret reason why she was so determined not to marry.
One of the most popular was that Elizabeth had some ‘womanish infirmity’ that prevented her from conceiving. This gained such currency that a foreign ambassador bribed the queen’s laundresses to report on the state of her sheets so that they might discover whether her menstrual cycle was normal.
At the opposite end of the scale, there was a theory that the real reason Elizabeth would not marry was because she was really a man. According to the ‘Bisley Boy’ story, the real Elizabeth had died as a young girl and been replaced by the only redheaded child that could be found. The fact that he was a boy was inconvenient, but he spent the rest of his life dressing as a woman to continue the pretence.
The Bisley Boy theory has proved a curiously enduring one, despite the lack of any reliable evidence.’
As clear a case of wishful-thinking bollocks as I’ve seen in ages.
Yawn yawn
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.