DaisyAnne
You haven't annoyed me Urmstongran. Saddened me perhaps. It's not about Carrie. It's not about the cake. It's about the assumption rules don't apply if you are Johnson and it's about the lies, upon lies, upon lies to us and to Parliament.
It's not about Carrie. It's not about the cake. It's about the assumption rules don't apply if you are Johnson and it's about the lies, upon lies, upon lies to us and to Parliament.
This is the point, isn't it?
As his former Eton Classics Master said in a report to Johnson's father, Stanley, "he thinks he should be free of the 'network of obligation that binds everyone", and further condemned him for being "affronted when criticised for what amounts to a gross failure of responsibility"
... and that's exactly it... that's how he behaves still when he's being held to account - how dare we have the effrontery, why should we criticise him....
He has no sense of 'the other', of other people. He is the true Ayn Rand hero - she admired people who felt no obligation to consider anyone else, or anything else but self-interest.
Yes, the misdemeanour is small beer in comparison to Ukraine - but that's not the point is it? It's the way he's lied, tried to baffle and confound.... his complete and utter lack of integrity.
"He's apologised" say his supporters. Well of course he has... now - because he's been caught out and has no option other than to apologise.
We deserve better than this. I'm beginning not to care who replaces him, as long as the person who does has a modicum of integrity and honesty. If you cannot have faith in, nor trust, your PM, because he continually lies, then democracy just becomes a joke. And maybe to Johnson, it is. He has no respect for it.