Virginia Giuffre and the missing picture

He accepts Epstein trafficked young girls and regrets his association with Epstein, he is giving the money to the charity
to support young girls

That's rather clever isn't it. Accepting Epstein trafficked young girls and regretting his association is a long way from admitting he had sex with a girl he knew had been trafficked.

I assume she accepts it

Seems a reasonable way out of this mess. I bet the Queen's relieved.

A substantial sum - out of court hush money.

https://signal-corridor.live/uploads/talk/202202/medium-102309-pa-plus-vg-photo.jpg%3C/span%3E https://signal-corridor.live/uploads/talk/202202/medium-795821-vg-yacht.jpg%3C/span%3E

Germanshepherdsmum

I haven’t seen the yacht photo. Can anyone post a link to it?

PA and VG versus VG alone.

Windsor was never going to court. Too much would come out.

Giuffre has played a blinder. This will followWindsor for the rest of his life and Giuffre’s character has been restored by Windsor’s statement.

They've reached an out of court settlement, no doubt a thread on that will be imminent

I see it the other way round wwm. PA was adamant that he was going to testify, she was adamant she wouldn’t accept a settlement - then the photo went missing when PA’s lawyers wanted an expert to examine it and suddenly everything changed.

No way. Windsor going to court in the middle of the Queens jubilee year!!?. It would run for months and months. That was just bravado on his part.

Germanshepherdsmum

I see it the other way round wwm. PA was adamant that he was going to testify, she was adamant she wouldn’t accept a settlement - then the photo went missing when PA’s lawyers wanted an expert to examine it and suddenly everything changed.

I see it that way round too. I'm no fan of PA but that photo/lack of photo is significant imo.

Breaking News…..Andrew has settled!

Blimey as a solicitor that is a very naive statement.

How long do you think it has taken them to agree on the wording of the final statement by Windsor. That document would have been going back and forwards for weeks.

Of course the photo hadn’t been lost, and how do you know that the photo being produced as “evidence” was real?

It wasn’t bravado wwm. He was set to give evidence next month. She was dead set on her day in court, no settlement. Ask yourself what changed her mind.

He was never going to court. It would have been a massive risk as evidence given would have almost certainly subsequently used for a criminal case.

It was never, never going to happen.

You obviously have inside knowledge.

How do you know the photo hasn't been lost, and what makes you think that it wasn't going to be produced as evidence Whitewavemark?

How do you know "He was never going to court"?

She says that the FBI have the original photo and she has a copy.

Smileless2012

How do you know the photo hasn't been lost, and what makes you think that it wasn't going to be produced as evidence Whitewavemark?

How do you know "He was never going to court"?

she didn't say it was lost. The daily mail and sun have said, she said it was lost
she said it was not in her possession!

I’m not surprised she doesn’t have the original.
I’m relieved they reached an agreed settlement. I heard some of it read out on the 4pm news. It sounded to have been well researched, discussed and agreed to the satisfaction of both parties. Good.

Yes, it’s over

When did she say that Judy?

so that's that then.
so no more threads on it all then ? ...maybe.

Smileless2012

When did she say that Judy?

if you are referring to me, it was in the Telegraph and other news story information

Oh god my other quoted post makes no sense of all She didn't say it was lost, she said it wasn't in her possession
The Sun and daily mail have ran with she has lost it, but as the hate women generally, maybe no one should be surprised by that