Alegrias, you completely misunderstand me.
I was not talking about managing the land economically but using it sustainably in a way that preserves the delicate habitats and plants, insects and micro-organisms that live on ancient pastures and without that grazing would become extinct. Dung beatles are so called for a reason, and that is only one of many organisms that rely on animal dung for life and existence.
To dismiss a whole post just because of some throw away remarks in the last para seems a very unbalanced way to respond to a post which apart from that was a considered argument for continuing to keep cattle and eat meat, albeit much less than we eat now.
I am no supporter of the industrialised meat industry that relies on feeding cattle feedstuffs their digestions are not adapted to, which make them ill and leads to high methane emissions and an immense industrial structure which also contributes to global warming through the machinery, transport, storage and slurry handling and cattle managing tractors etc. And that is before I start on the welfare of the animals, unable to graze, fed unsuitable food, leading msierable lives, for them slaughter must be a blessed relief.
I am all for cattle grazed on land they have formed and sustained for thousands of years, free to graze and wander, on grass, full of other wild plants that enable them often to self medicate, with little interference from humans unless their welfare requires it. These animals produce very little methane nor does their rearing need equipment, the transport and use of fertilisers etc. It is entirely benign.