Anniebach
Well said Smileless , a couple who left the country, wanted privacy, didn’t want the life of being a royal yet use their family
for publicity to make money, even using The Queen , how can
anyone defend this .
That appears to be the problem doesn’t it Annie? There has been rigorous defence of Harry and Meghan’s behaviour whatever their behaviour has been and however unkind and disrespectful to the royal family. If Harry and Meghan had quietly left their royal duties and chosen to live quietly on their substantial fortunes then there would have been many people disappointed and who would have expressed their disappointment, but as time went on they would have been out of the limelight and gradually forgotten, maybe being seen occasionally as part of the family on special occasions. But that isn’t what they did. They are regularly in the news, courting publicity it seems at every available opportunity, giving interviews and making podcasts about everything from how much money they are given (unearned) to generations of poor parenting and of course, a lot more besides. That is what many people despise to be honest, but others support. Those who support seem to be anti royalists in the main and it is of course perfectly acceptable to hold anti royalist views. However lending support to the behaviour of Harry and Meghan is at times indefensible. If a close friend or relative of our own behaved in such a way I think we all would find it to be reprehensible. But the royal family cannot answer back and as Harry and Meghan know this, it is particularly reprehensible.