* ab* it’s evetything to do with BJ and his class and education. He said it for cheap political advantage and anyone who believes otherwise is deluded. We shouldn’t dignify his filthy use of language with serious discussion. I can just imagine your reaction if JC had used that language in that context - but BJ is a Tory and thus beyond reproach for you I guess
Thankfully I am not a victim of sexual abuse. I imagine people must want answers/closure/ to be heard. I think all those dead or alive should be investigated.
And he was being interviewed on national radio which is proof positive of how self absorbed and entitled he is - no respect for anyone and free to say what he wants when he wants.
I think the phrase 'spaffed up a wall' represents his education and class. It was ill chosen, but presumably this is the way he talks in private among his peers.
He was hardly a model of financial prudence when he had charge of the Mayor's budget, buying useless water cannon and spending out huge amounts of money on the Garden Bridge vanity project. Trying to clarify past events for victims is a much better use of money in my opinion.
He used the words ‘malarchy’ and ‘spaffed up the wall’ which means ejaculating up the wall. In the context of child abuse all the words used an utter disgrace and another clear signal if one were needed that this man is totally unfit for any office including that of MP. I won’t join in what should be a serious discussion when it was ‘inspired’ by these comments made as they were by a thoughtless, egotistical, self serving, entitled, well documented liar.
Apparently the word 'spaffed' is a slang term with a sexual meaning. Surely a well educated person like Boris would know that it was inappropriate to be so crass. With regards to spending money to investigate historical crimes, some countries do have a time bar and it might be worth introducing that here.
I don't think it was just the celebrity investigations Boris was criticising. He said "One comment I would make is that I think an awful lot of the money, an awful lot of police time, now goes into these historic offences and all this malarkey - £60m I saw was being spaffed up the wall on some investigation into historic child abuse and all this kind of thing I watched the revelations about the abuse at Medomsley young offenders institution. The stories were horrendous and I can't see how anyone could deny the boys who were abused the right to see prosecutions and acknowledgement of their suffering. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-47258310 It may also be that the prosecutions will prevent any others from imagining they are free to do as they wish because they have power over others. Mind you as far as Boris goes perhaps his attitude is the result of his education- private boys school????
What do you think about Boris Johnson's pronouncements regarding the investigations into historical sexual abuse? Does the attempted clarification of facts to establish the guilt or otherwise regarding a long dead politician or celebrity need to be pursued, as there can be no trial or any meaningful result for the abused, or should we be using that money to help fight knife crime and protect people today?