I agree that the church should have a responsibility towards the poor, and huge investments are likely to be questioned, however the church also has a responsibility for upkeep of historic buildings and provision of the pensions of its employees and I think many of the investments are probably providing for these things.
When it comes to helping the poor, I volunteer with the local winter night shelter for the homeless. and most of the nights are hosted by churches, a mixture of CofE, Roman Catholic and Baptist churches. Our nearest venue for giving out foodbank donations is a local church and the church I attend has an ongoing collection for the foodbank which I help administer with a retired friend who volunteers at the foodbank. I realise there is a difference between what individual churches do and the activities of the church commissioners but it is not always as simple as we may think.
As for zero hours contracts, it is true that many people (not just the young) like the flexibility of zero hours contracts. Some organisations would not be able to function without them but there are those who exploit workers. For instance people who invigilate exams in schools work on zero hours contracts but when they apply for the jobs they understand exactly what it involves and that it will simply be in exam season, which is not necessarily true for all people in zero hours contract jobs who may not get as much work as they want or need. Not all zero hours contracts are bad but some definitely are!
Charity Shops Making Donations Uncomfortable



