I watched the Tony Blair speech at the 'OPEN EUROPE' event and the first thing that hit me was he was introduced by Labour MP Pat McFadden, MP for Wolverhampton South.
I think McFadden is a reasonable MP but I did wonder how his prominent role at the ' 'OPEN EUROPE' event would be seen by the voters in another Midlands constituency ,Stoke - On - Trent. Wolverhampton like Stoke-On-Trent was a high percentage 'LEAVE' area and Labour are trying to retain Stoke Central in the upcoming by-election. Did he and Tony Blair help Labour with the timing of this speech?
Tony Blair is a cup of cold sick to many, feted by others. We will each have our own opinions as to whether Blair words were 'wisely/democratic' or 'trouble making/undemocratic' I suppose.
To my mind the likes of Tony Blair are toxic and could well have the opposite effect to what 'OPEN EUROPE' had hoped for by using him as a spokesperson.
Why toxic? Because he is a political elite, Millionaire, globalist, property owning, self serving individual who is known to mix with and give 'guidance' to some pretty undemocratic Leaders and people will consider anything he says as suspicious.
Tony Blair making this speech will probably make those who voted 'LEAVE' to dig their heels in all the more, let's face it he wasn't speaking to those who voted 'REMAIN' was he, other than telling them to 'RISE UP'.
His speech was possibly one of the most undemocratic speeches made over result of the EU Referendum. His attack on both the government and Labour won't have fooled many.
His use of the term 'RISE UP' simply does not sit well with a hell of a lot of voters who are not given to activism and demonstrations and whether or not it was meant to be taken literally it will be viewed by some to do exactly that. He might just cause more trouble than he expected, or did he knowingly understand what reaction his speech 'could possibly' have and trouble making was the point?