Granjura
"Imagine a divorce - where one partner decides to leave and break up- then expects the other party to take all the losses?
I want to leave you, but I want the house, the CDs, the furniture, the car and you can have the lawn-mower and the small tv from the bedroom. Oh, but I want half your pension and the kids to myself."
You think that doesn't happen.
A divorce should be an arrangement that makes sense for both parties and cause the least disruption as possible for a non acrimonious , harmonious parting should it not?
That will take the two parties showing maturity in their negotiations for the sake of both parties future will it not.
The point of a divorce surely is they can no longer agree so what is the point of a divorce if the rules, the term of engagement , the day to day living has to be maintained for the divorce to go ahead.?
The UK and the other 27 countries are not in a position to come up with anything other than a trade agreement that will benefit all 28 countries. The people of those 28 countries will not forgive the EU Commission/Parliament/UK Government if they do not .
The question is will the mantra/the European panacea of 'Ever Closer Union' enshrinement take precedence over common sense and the need for ALL 28 countries to trade with each other.
Does the EU 'demand' in it's negotiations with other countries outside of the European Union the 'Free Movement of People', NO.
Does the UK require workers from other countries including those in the EU of course it does. Workers not those who will rely on welfare. That applies to all countries and is becoming an issue for others too.
Surely to goodness it is not beyond the wit of man, supposedly intelligent politicians to come up with an agreement.
I remain concerned if this could/will happen given the choice of Arch European Federalists such as Guy Verhofstadt and Mr Seeuws it's a dead duck before one word 'officially' is spoken.