No, they do not have holiday pay. They are paid for the weeks they work.
However, the councils can change their contracts, giving them three months notice.
This is what some councils are doing.
They are changing their contracts to say they are being paid for 52 weeks. But as they are not teachers, they are only allowed 5 weeks holiday, not the 13 weeks which teachers get. Therefore their pay can be reduced by 8 weeks. Nice, eh?
Unison is on the case.
I know quite a few teachers, and quite a few teaching assistants.
If Durham does this, the teaching assistants I know will work to rule, which will please the government because they do not like teaching assistants. However, they do not want to pay more teachers. They want it the cheapest way possible.
When I was a teacher, I sometimes worked on supply. The pay we got was quite high, because we were paid the same amount as we would have been if we had been on a permanent contract, but it was divide by 200, the number of days we would have worked. Our daily pay was higher than it would have been but over the year it was the same.
This is how most teaching assistants are paid, for the days, not the year.
Would you like your pay/pension reduced by £200 a month because someone had found a loophole?