How about this for efficiency, professionalism and sensitivity jingle:
(The Mirror)
"A depressed blind man killed himself after he was left penniless because his benefits were slashed, an inquest heard
"Desperate Tim Salter struggled to even feed himself when controversial private firm Atos ruled he was fit for work, despite his failing eyesight.
The 53-year-old, who also suffered agoraphobia, was about to be kicked out of his housing association home when he hanged himself in the hall.
A coroner ruled the Government’s decision to axe Tim’s meagre incapacity benefit [£30 per week] contributed to his death."
or this:
"A man who was forced to give up work with heart problems had his benefits axed for failing to complete a capability assessment - after suffering a heart attack during the examination.
During the appointment, he was told he was having a cardiac arrest, forcing the nurse to stop the test.
Two weeks later he got a letter from Jobcentre Plus saying he had withdrawn from the assessment and, as such, was being sanctioned."
I agree that having a job can be helpful in alleviating depression and other illnesses. A job can take a person's mind off their problems and provide a routine and a sense of control over one's life. However, people who have had a serious physical or mental illness or who are experiencing a gradual deterioration in a chronic illness/disability must be sensitively supported into finding a job which will take account of their specific health issues. And people who have terminal illnesses or whose illnesses are very painful or debilitating should, I feel, be left alone.
Illness can seriously affect a person's confidence and can make them fearful of new situations. I expect anyone on Gransnet who has, for instance, fallen as a result of a giddy spell or deteriorating mobility will know that it can lead to anxiety about going out alone or even going out at all. Likewise, people who have had a heart attack become fearful that anything they do might bring on another attack. It seems that assessments very much focus on basic physical tasks, without properly considering the psychological barriers that are also likely to be present.
Anyway, as someone else said, there may not be suitable jobs available and many employers are reluctant to take on people who are perhaps older and who have been absent from the workplace through serious illness, or people of any age who have had mental health or addiction issues. Many of the jobs that have been created in the last few years fall under the "self-employed" category and are part-time. One in four new jobs created are now zero hours contracts. It seems to me that neither of these options are suitable for someone who has been ill because the inevitable anxiety connected to uncertain hours of work and levels of income may well cause a recurrence of the illness, or worse.
Somehow I don't believe Iain Duncan Smith's proposals to tighten up the system is motivated by a deep and heartfelt concern for the claimants' wellbeing.