Choosing a place to live entirely on location is a route to disaster. Go to any seaside resort that is popular with retirees and listen to the stories of lonely old people who came down in retirement and failed to settle or make social contacts and who hadn't taken into account available services. Far from friends and family, they live sad lonely lives. Perhaps not our generation, but the one before. For us the tales come from Spain, and France and other overseas retirement places
What matters, first of all, is whether the place you are thinking about moving to offers opporunities that you would enjoy to build up a social life. You may live in the best location ever, but loneliness kills. If there is nothing in the place you live, which helps you build a social life, you will not enjoy your wonderful safe location for long.
Then look at services, doctors, hospitals, shops, trains and busese. Again no point in moving somewhere beautiful and safe if the doctor is 5 miles distant and the hospital 30 miles distant, buses go at 9.00am and return at 6.00pm and the nearest railway station 15 miles away (no bus).
Only if the location you choose can meet every other need should you consider moving to it.
We had a friend who did exactly what you say you are doing, putting location first. She moved somewhere lovely and despite being a very sociable person, could find nothing in the area she chose that interested her, and locals were not very friendly. She lasted 3 years, and died of cancer, alone, because, family could not get to her as she was so far away from them.
So let’s have a thread for the summer lovers
GB News wins award for Best News Channel for 4th year running

