Madgran77
I am frankly astounded at the number of people who are not seeing the risks here ..... so caught up in the "over bearing" GPs/MIL syndrome and the "Dad should" bla bla.
The fact is that child abuse cases frequently relate to someone known to them and parent partners are high on the list of perpetrators....it is entirely right to question this arrangement in that context. Ofcourse it may be that there is no danger; that Mjm has fully assessed and considered all risks and knows there arent any; that Dad needs to do more or intervene more or whatever
But the Grandmother is right and proper to be concerned and she is checking that out on here!!
My last post disappeared.
--We have no information on whether or not there should be concern for child abuse. We have a post titled "Daughter in Law's selfishness". A soon to be former MIL judging her soon to be ex DIL's dating choices (shock). That's it. No one on Gransnet knows the DIL or son. No one has insight into their lives, so I cannot imagine how anyone on the internet can "check out" whether the OP is valid in judging her DIL's dating life.
--There should never be a "blah blah blah" followed by a father's responsibilities. It's not the dad should intervene "or whatever". It's "the dad needs to properly and formally address any safeguarding issues there may be." Period. His duties to his child should never be downplayed or minimized. It is not a secondary issue. It is THE issue. This child belongs to him. If the child is in danger, it's HIS responsibility to be his child's advocate and protector. There is no evidence anywhere in this post that the child is in danger, so no she is not right to or proper to come to the internet complaining about her DIL essentially getting on with life without her son. If there was evidence the child is in danger, OP should contact social services and/or the police, along with questioning her son as to why he wasn't doing more. Her focus on her DIL is misguided but typical.