I had my second daughter at home, 1975, after first was induced in 1973 and I felt it was a bad experience. 22 mothers and babies in the ward. Little rest. The second time I had to change GPs to get one to agree, the midwife was one keen and it went 10 days over the date they said I was due but I knew I was not, as the first time, long cycle. On the last night I went into labour, called the midwife, who came with 2 students, and it all stopped! She gave me a sleeping pill and went but it began again. Husband, Navy officer, had seen the medical training film and said no problem, he could handle it! By the time we called the midwives back I was pushing but all was well. They were in time to catch the baby. Unlike first time, no clumsy episiotomy, happy 22 month old able to see her sister early, gran then took her off for the day to let us rest.
That second daughter, 41 years later, had my small grandson at home, her first child, birthing pool in her kitchen, happy father, lovely midwives taking photos! (more detail than I actually wanted to see) . She breast fed for ages, as I had done her. Much easier than with my first as the ward made it difficult then. In both cases home birth relaxed and better.
The data when I had that daughter showed that mothers and babies had better success rates and fewer infection rates with home births. I think it compared with Netherlands where many in 1975 were at home. In both cases we'd have been able to go to hospital if there had been complications before or during birth.