Of course 'porker' is a derogatory word. I don't know why anyone would wish to defend it. Though I suspect it is only people who aren't overweight who think it's a perfectly acceptable description.
I have known people who justify their use of cruel language by saying they're only 'being honest', or 'calling a spade a spade'. Katie Hopkins is the queen of this behaviour and I don't believe there are many people who admire her, so why try to emulate her, even slightly?
I was brought up to be kind to people, to not say anything hurtful. It seems to me that there are people who feel morally superior by claiming not to be two-faced - that saying something to someone's face is better than saying it behind their back. Isn't it better just to not say it at all? To have some compassion, some understanding, to make allowances? I'm sure we would all wish others to make allowances for us at times.
The Golden Rule is the one we should all live by: treat others as you would wish to be treated. It's simple really 
Gransnet forums
Dieting & exercise
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »





