The thread about the Telegraph “greatest” book article:
www.gransnet.com/forums/books_book_club/a1360704-50-Greatest-books-of-all-time?msgid=31739197#31739197
My reply:
*
… our critic picks the half-century of highlights that any serious reader should have on their shelf.
[Jake] Kerridge has organised his list in to pre-17C, 17C & 18C, 19C, 20C and 21C.
Only a serious scholar of literature is going to have read most of those. Several are long verse novels and hard going.
I have read many of them as I have degree in English and they were course material but I wouldn’t have picked most of them as reading for pleasure.
I am afraid than like much in the Telegraph nowadays, the headline is misleading. It’s just one man’s choice and he’s trying to impress.
As lists go, I much preferred The Guardian’s recent list of 100 novels which was a collaborative affair, Still serious works but more accessible, in my opinion. I have read all of them.
www.theguardian.com/books/ng-interactive/2026/may/12/the-100-best-novels-of-all-time
I do consider myself well read. My favourite novel is Middlemarch, which I can read again and again, but some evenings I just want to sit with a cosy crime or something equally light that romps along, something by Graham Norton or similar.
*
If you refer to the Guardian list, Lisa Allardice makes it clear that the newspaper polled 170 novelists, critics and academics for their top 10, ranked in order, which were tallied to compile an overall 100.
In other words, 170 opinions not just one - which sums up the opening post really and the reference to one irritable reviewer on Trustpilot and an AI response which depends on what question was asked.
When I asked ChapGPT for an appraisal, the response was:
a tight-knit sense of community. Users frequently report building genuine, long-term friendships with people they have never met face-to-face.
On the negative side it says:
because the user base is relatively small compared to Mumsnet, critics point out that the forum can feel insular. The same small group of users and cyclical arguments tend to dominate the active threads.
Both of those seem reasonable comments.
ChatGPT’s appraisal mentions neither political nor moderation bias.
Curious that the negative Trustpilot review was made while the book list discussion was current and that it's being cited now.