Oreo
PoorJenny a question for you, have you literally just joined this site?Like this morning?
.
I wondered that, Oreo.
On another (maybe unrelated) note, a while ago there was an influx of lurkers supposedly from as far afield as the US and Mumsnet, who had simultaneously been watching GN closely and decided (individually) to swoop onto a particular thread to criticise 'Queen Bees' (they may have called them something else, I can't remember, but the gist was the same). They were very unpleasant and the whole thing seemed like an orchestrated attack - much of which was on one poster. That these were all different people acting independently, all with a grudge against one person was several steps too far from believable for me.
Some People get very invested in what is, after all, just a discussion site. Often when threads like this get going there are people who say they've been lurkers who, having watched the rest of us chatting to one another from the sidelines, have decided to tell us all where we've gone wrong and how to mend our ways. They haven't bothered to join in, or risk being taken the wrong way themselves (it can be easy to get on the wrong side of someone by accidentally saying something that rubs them up the wrong way) but have remembered who annoys them (with or without a list) and taken against a group of people with whom they've never even interacted.
Far, far better to join in, and say what you think at the time. The site would benefit from a bigger pool of posters, louder voices would be diluted a bit, and there'd be a chance to tell QBs to wind their necks in.
Either way, regulars are not here to perform for lurkers who don't contribute. There's nothing we can do about them other than form a private closed group, (and they tend to die quite quickly) but neither should we be expected to listen to criticisms from people who have chosen not to join us for their sport.
Oh, and by coincidence these threads always happen when schools and universities are in recess 🤔