My experience was that the people who hadn't taken and/or passed exams were often 'better' than those that had.
Accountancy was one of the professions affected when the polytechnics rebranded themselves as "new" universities and began offering degrees in subjects not offered by the traditional universities. Degrees in accountancy, library and information science, education and so on. Before that people had taken the internal exams of the associations in librarianship or accountancy or they went to teacher training college. So in the late 1970s/early 1980s these experienced and qualified (but sometimes older) staff were dispreferred by short sighted employers in favour of the new graduates.
I can recall applying for a position I was well qualified for but losing out to a graduate who had a 2/2 degree in a completely different subject. A colleage told me that he had "a bit of paper that I didnt have." I told the colleague that I was thinking of going to uni to get my own bit of paper. However if I was going to make that sacrifice I wanted a 2/1. He shook his head and said "Nah, you can get a first." Back in the 1980s a first still meant something and only 10% of graduates got one.
My colleague left and rose to the very top of his profession as librarian of a very well known organization in London and was my referee for my university application.
Patronising comments about mature love
