Wheniwasyourage
I'm surprised you can't seem to appreciate the difference, MaryXYX, between a transwoman who has had hormones and surgery and lived as a woman throughout that gruelling process, and an intact man who for some reason wants to be in a woman-only space. I think that most of us would probably be quite happy with sharing spaces with the first, if only because it might be very difficult to tell she was a transwoman rather than a woman born in a female body. She would not want to draw attention to herself, I would imagine. There would be no threat of a penis being used in anger from that kind of transwoman.
The kind most of us do not want to share single-sex spaces with is the second, whose motives are distictly questionable.
Exactly my point of view, WIWYA.
The differences are in the commitment, and that someone without a penis who is taking female hormones is unlikely to pose a threat to women - they are at least trying to be as women are. Bearded self-identifiers, on the other hand, have shown no commitment to becoming a woman, and the system is open to abuse. There is a subset of transpeople/allies who appear to resent women having anything for ourselves - whether that is safe spaces, sports teams, shortlists, language to describe ourselves, and this is more of the same. We can't have counsellors who specialise in dealing with women who have been raped or sexually assaulted. We are now (according to the more misogynistic end of the trans agenda) not supposed to even have the crime of rape restricted to penetration with a penis, as that would make it clear that the perpetrator is male!
'Peeps' (whatever they are) can keep repeating that TWAW till the cows come home, but saying it won't make it so. They are transwomen.
Good post Rosie