Wyllow3
*Doodledog*, I feel it depends so much on individuals. We keep talking about "vulnerable women" as if all one group, no differences.
It assumes for example that all vulnerable women don't want anything to do with all men?
No, there are many differences. All of us are vulnerable at some times and not at others. When we've just given birth, when we are naked, when we are ill, are just three examples.
We usually go on to get better, we can put clothes on, and our bodies will heal after childbirth, but during those times, in hospital, in a changing room, many women won't want men around. Not all men - we might actively want our husband, our sons, our male friends, and male doctors and nurses. Maybe even a male first aider if there is an accident in the pool's changing room. But the point is that we know who they are, and that they are there legitimately.
Of course some transwomen would also be there with innocent purpose, but the fact is that allowing self-identifying transwomen in open the door to all men, and some of them will have nefarious intent. There is also the issue of religions which disallow women from being undressed in front of men other than their husbands.
We can be psychologically vulnerable too, eg if we've been raped, and not want to be near or to speak to a male until we are ready. That doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Does it to you?