Duchess of Sussex the bullying has to stop.

She may regret the content too but then again, maybe not.

Meghan has given another article to a magazine as ever criticising the RF.

I’m saying no more other than she may regret the cover.

www.thecut.com/tags/meghan-markle/

And don’t all jump on me. First impressions can be a bit of a shock.

Harry and Megan flying into England next week, then to Germany and back to England, so he isn’t going to be a
raindrop

Oops, sorry . Cross post.

I would do this in words of one syllable, but I don't think I can. Moving pictures might help.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctKmI0vbMzg 2 minutes 30 in. 2 days old.

Maybe a bit more attention is needed?

Oops sorry. I thought the b & w and coloured one were the 2 day old ones. My bad.

It's bonkers on GN when the photo uploaded by a poster gets mixed up in the post of a previous poster, some can hardly see it.

I pay attention to the minutest details in photos! That photo is no way when he was 2 days old, it's the same as the Christening one.

You can't have been paying attention merlotgran or was it just another excuse to have a dig at Meghan?

Clearly not as much attention as you have, Glorianny

https://signal-corridor.live/uploads/talk/202208/medium-964736-skynews-baby-archie-royal-meghan-4711554.jpg%3C/span%3E https://signal-corridor.live/uploads/talk/202208/medium-605744-download-1.jpg%3C/span%3E

merlotgran

^Actually the "first glimpse of Archie" was in a photo shoot 2 days after his birth!^
I would imagine she would want to meet Desmond Tutu. She'd done a lot of work in Africa. And how dare the mother of a 4 month old baby moan!

I purposely didn’t count the glimpse of Archie’s nose.

Moaning in such a public way in a country full of deprivation did not impress a lot of people. As I said, my opinion was formed by my interpretation.

Archie at 2 days old-bit more than a nose.
And when he was christened at about 3 months.
You can't have been paying attention merlotgran or was it just another excuse to have a dig at Meghan?

You... you mean she answered questions honestly?

They were meat and drink to those of a rather naive persuasion.

You... you mean she answered questions honestly?

What next?

As I said, my opinion was formed by my interpretation.

No s*** Sherlock

Actually the "first glimpse of Archie" was in a photo shoot 2 days after his birth!
I would imagine she would want to meet Desmond Tutu. She'd done a lot of work in Africa. And how dare the mother of a 4 month old baby moan!

I purposely didn’t count the glimpse of Archie’s nose.

Moaning in such a public way in a country full of deprivation did not impress a lot of people. As I said, my opinion was formed by my interpretation.

They rarely mention her on our news here, I think they think she is boring. I find out about her here on gransnet. When I think about it, we don’t hear that much about any of that mob. No doubt when the Queen pops her clogs they will go on about it.

www.itv.com/news/2019-10-18/meghan-prince-harry-tom-bradby-itv-african-journey-documentary

Copied with no comment. I guess how you interpret it says a lot about how you view the world and the people in it.

merlotgran

Whether or not Meghan wanted to continue after the alleged fire, I have no doubt she was keen to undertake the tour to SA.

Visiting Desmond Tutu, where we all got a first glimpse of Archie and bleating to Tom Bradby about how hard life was in the RF was pure Meghan - as I saw it. Others may disagree. Opinions are based on our interpretation of events.

Actually the "first glimpse of Archie" was in a photo shoot 2 days after his birth!
I would imagine she would want to meet Desmond Tutu. She'd done a lot of work in Africa. And how dare the mother of a 4 month old baby moan!

Whether or not Meghan wanted to continue after the alleged fire, I have no doubt she was keen to undertake the tour to SA.

Visiting Desmond Tutu, where we all got a first glimpse of Archie and bleating to Tom Bradby about how hard life was in the RF was pure Meghan - as I saw it. Others may disagree. Opinions are based on our interpretation of events.

Anniebach

Trying to think of Megan being intimidated ?

... proving my point somewhat.

You're speculating that it's impossible for her to be intimidated - based on what evidence?

Megan said they were married three days before the wedding day.

Must be true then, illegal but true

??‍♀️

volver says Must be true then

here she comes!

Megan lied in the Oprah interview, lied several times, it’s difficult to believe a known liar

lemsip

The Title of this thread is misleading..

PRINCE Harry slammed the phone down on Prince William after being confronted with witness statements portraying Meghan as a bully, an explosive French documentary provides new insights into the rift between the royal brothers and blames the behaviour of Harry’s wife Meghan for it.

Must be true then.

The Title of this thread is misleading..

PRINCE Harry slammed the phone down on Prince William after being confronted with witness statements portraying Meghan as a bully, an explosive French documentary provides new insights into the rift between the royal brothers and blames the behaviour of Harry’s wife Meghan for it.

I think most of us who have given birth remember how vulnerable you are afterwards and how (especially with your first child) you listen to everyone and try to do what they tell you is best.

Trying to think of Megan being intimidated ?