Could someone point me to where it has been posted on GN that ‘transwomen would alienate themselves from friends and family, be viewed as something between a freak and a laughing stock, damage their health and massively reduce their chances (changes) of a ‘normal’ life JUST to infiltrate women only spaces?”
That’s terribly insulting to the majority of transwomen. Since selfID without surgery has been allowed, the number of self ID has increased more than the surgical route.
Some trans consider surgery an essential part of their transition. Others do not and that is their choice.
I have no figures for whether those using their trans status to gain access to natal women only spaces or activities have had surgery. It would really only matter if they used their male strength or appendages to intimidate or attack women.
It would be more accurate to say that a few men, identifying as transwomen but quite often avoiding the painful surgery involved in complete gender reassignment, use that status to endanger women in prison and are allowed to do so even when they have been incarcerated for attacking or raping women.
GagaJo, exactly how many such attacks on women in prison would be acceptable before the rights of natal women would take precedence over the rights of transwomen instead of the other way round as it is now?