Gransnet forums

Chat

Prince Andrew

(917 Posts)
Lilypops Sat 16-Nov-19 22:42:02

Having just watched the interview with Emily Maitlis, I just cannot make my mind up about him , I find it strange that he could not recollect having that photo taken with the girl with his arm around him , I thought he was very cautious with his answers, What do you all think ?

Whitewavemark2 Sat 23-Nov-19 10:35:13

According to the same article that while Andrew was making the programme, his erstwhile wife was enjoying herself cavorting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. He of the chopping people up fame - particularly reporters who disagree with him.

“Everyone has been so nice here in Riyadh” she gushed. “ That is what comes from having good leadership”

Blimey

Anniebach Sat 23-Nov-19 10:28:48

Yes loopylou but that is how it is now , with the exception of
Harry and Megan. Charles blocked Andrew’s daughters from official duties and having security. Edward’s children still in school, Anne’s children do their own thing.

Andrew is out, Fergie been out since the divorce.

loopylou Sat 23-Nov-19 10:05:58

I would like to see a slimmed down monarchy; Charles, William, Catherine (not sure about Harry and Meghan in light of their grievances with just about everyone, perhaps they'd be happier doing their own thing and earning their own money?). Then the next tier would be Anne, Edward and Sophie.
Definitely no role whatsoever for Andrew (and Fergie who's probably not going to be happy with the £££££ cut off - and why was she summoned to the Palace?)

Anniebach Sat 23-Nov-19 09:52:28

I wish those who speak of a slimmed down monarchy would name who should not carry out royal duties .

oldgimmer1 Sat 23-Nov-19 09:48:20

"He" being PA, not Boris!

oldgimmer1 Sat 23-Nov-19 09:47:41

@white: I haven't read the article yet but I think it's interesting the way the Monarchy have responded to the PA situation.

Even HM didn't come out of Borisgate looking great, did she?

I think the way he's been chucked under a bus suggests a lack of confidence and yes, once Her Maj goes, what's left?

Time for a regroup with Charles the head of a slimmed-down monarchy?

They'll survive though, I think. But there'll be less emphasis on "the Royal Family" and more on "Monarchy".

They always manage to adapt.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 23-Nov-19 09:31:37

Interesting article in the paper today, suggesting that with the queens demise there is not a lot holding the monarchy together, and it is possible if not likely that it will implode.

Alexa Sat 23-Nov-19 09:29:31

Callistemon I think you are right. The moral role model is not necessarily the same sex parent, or even a parent. Possibly Ghislaine was much influenced as a child by affection and other goods lavished on her, so that she also imbibed the moral attitude of the role model. I do believe this happens although I wonder what status it has in law.

suziewoozie Sat 23-Nov-19 09:19:46

Who said that? Totally fallacious conclusion drawn illogically and irrationally.

oldgimmer1 Sat 23-Nov-19 09:18:34

So it's ok for a man to be logical, rational and "lacking in empathy" but not a woman? hmm

MawB Sat 23-Nov-19 09:14:51

It’s not the rationally or logically oldgimmer it’s the lack of empathy

suziewoozie Sat 23-Nov-19 09:13:56

You’re definitely a ‘man’. Have the courage to own it, it’s not your fault.

suziewoozie Sat 23-Nov-19 09:12:56

Using her surname only is a deliberate negative act towards her old.: As for your thinking rationally and logically, you’d be lucky.

oldgimmer1 Sat 23-Nov-19 09:09:18

I have not said that I do not have sympathy for the victims, the alleged victims, or for Giuffre.

And I find the notion that I cannot be a woman because I think rationally and logically deeply offensive and sexist.

suziewoozie Sat 23-Nov-19 00:19:07

Absolutely agree with that pink

pinkquartz Fri 22-Nov-19 23:27:23

No I it is the wrong word...but the poster has no heart or feelings.

Callistemon Fri 22-Nov-19 23:09:26

The Maxwell woman (and I have no hesitation in referring to her by her surname) may be as insensitive to other people as her father was. He creamed off the pensions of his workers.

The apple didn't fall far from the tree there, did it!

suziewoozie Fri 22-Nov-19 22:54:10

Oh pink I don’t think the word intellectual is at all appropriate.

pinkquartz Fri 22-Nov-19 22:51:47

oldgimmer

I might be totally out of order but are you a man?

because you seem so uncaring for the plight of the young women....It is a fact that Epstein had abused dozens of young girls, some as young as twelve.

To me the issue of money is completely irrelevant.
What matters is to shine a light and see what has been going on and then go after them and women who were involved.
I imagine that the Maxwell woman was in it for the money....or was she just very evil?

Also you write so off hand about the abuse...You don't get it do You?

That is why it sounds like you are a bloke and also that you have no daughters.
If you had daughter you could not be dispassionate about this issue. I think.

Most fathers are outraged about predatory men on young girls and have a protective attitude.
You almost seen to regard this like an intellectual game

suziewoozie Fri 22-Nov-19 22:49:47

I think GN is a pretty disgusting place at the moment

Iam64 Fri 22-Nov-19 22:44:57

I think of all the trafficked and exploited children and feel so angered and dispirited on their behalf. “Fair game” indeed

suziewoozie Fri 22-Nov-19 22:12:14

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Anniebach Fri 22-Nov-19 22:07:28

I think oldgimmer means all parties in an investigation can be questioned

Iam64 Fri 22-Nov-19 21:52:20

And in any case, in an investigation of this sort, all parties are fair game. Nature of the beast

Unbelievable

oldgimmer1 Fri 22-Nov-19 21:41:51

No one's criticising his alleged victims.

Wondering what lies behind Giuffre's and other alleged victims' motivation of PA is not the same as criticising them. It's logical reasoning.

And in any case, in an investigation of this sort, all parties are fair game. Nature of the beast.