Gransnet forums

Chat

Mistress/bit of fluff/bit on the side

(28 Posts)
Septimia Sat 27-Jul-19 13:43:07

A lot of those terms suggest a new or short-term relationship, especially if it is clandestine and one or both of the parties is married. They are all rather derogatory and perhaps should only be used when really relevant rather than for people who have found themselves in a situation that they wouldn't normally want to be in.

'Bidey-in' always sounds to me more like a long-term/permanent but unofficial partnership. It has a sort of snug feel to it, as well as indicating its unofficial nature.

Razzy Sat 27-Jul-19 13:39:45

Generally there is a lot of language that is derogatory towards women but not towards men. Even starting with “the wife” or “the Missus”. Women are called slut, hussy, other woman. But men are not. A man who has more than one partner generally receives positive comments. Women nag or are bossy. Men are assertive. “Single mothers” is common whereas “single fathers” is not. “Working mum” is common but have you ever heard the term “working dad”?
There is a huge amount of sexist language, which I try hard to counter by pointing this out to my young daughter. Even jobs - “postman”, “female surgeon”, “woman pilot”. Yet you don’t hear anyone say they had a “male pilot” or a “male doctor” or “postwoman”.
I truly believe more parents need to be aware and teach their kids from a young age.

POGS Sat 27-Jul-19 11:48:50

On a current thread the discussion of a woman who is in a relationship , living with a man who is waiting for divorce has made me think about how we use rhetoric, perceive we are living in a more feminist world.

The woman in question has had the following attributed to her .:-

Blonde Bimbo
Mistresses
Bit of fluff
Another woman
Potential blackmailer
Pillow talker
Bit on the side
Other woman
Fancy piece
Squeeze
Luvaah
Bidey-in

There are thousands of women, perhaps some us have been in the position described, perhaps we have daughters, granddaughters who are now or have been in a partnership with a man who is waiting for his divorce to come through and as we know that can take months.

My question is, are the terms being used fairly toward women in this position in 2019?

Are they old fashioned, are they the rhetoric other woman should consider appropriate , are they names that only have one use and that is to show dislike/ virtuosity above other women/ showing a disapproval of.

I appreciate they are all terms of common parlance, time in memorial but surely the times have changed and divorce, living with somebody is no longer deemed as a sin, disgraceful, shocking .

What do others think and I accept that my opinion is not to every bodies persuasion but really can't the rhetoric be Partner, Other Half, Confidant, Companion , unless of course distain and disapproval is the aim toward the woman but surely we have evolved over the years .